From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let* Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:29:55 -0400 Message-ID: <20170912142955.GA31269@holos.localdomain> References: <87inh36sap.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <20170902021043.GA7509@holos.localdomain> <878thx7qcc.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <20170902041424.GA21189@holos.localdomain> <87tw0lzn7w.fsf@drachen> <20170902133604.GA27251@holos.localdomain> <20170904011356.GA21128@holos.localdomain> <20170905035548.GB11331@holos.localdomain> <87lglkcdy1.fsf@drachen> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505226791 20389 195.159.176.226 (12 Sep 2017 14:33:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:33:11 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.0 (2017-09-02) Cc: 28254@debbugs.gnu.org, Noam Postavsky To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 12 16:33:03 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmEv-0003ur-H7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:32:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36226 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmF2-0004cB-R3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:32:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44449) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmDU-0003Zw-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:31:09 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmDP-00075B-2w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:31:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:55504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1drmDO-00074m-TP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmDO-000213-Eq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:31:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:31:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28254 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28254-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28254.15052266077685 (code B ref 28254); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 14:31:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Sep 2017 14:30:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35952 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmCV-0001zt-KS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:30:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f179.google.com ([209.85.216.179]:33424) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1drmCR-0001y7-CX for 28254@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:30:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f179.google.com with SMTP id i50so26007691qtf.0 for <28254@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:30:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2n8/8Cm7mR6lwBynlCU7i7qRAbPVGGZk2VB72H7Lrdw=; b=ipM0sjW9CLZhwRHOv+F4luI8PzSJS2vEjORA2xjxhaz5yqkEGxr0k0ckfPoWHxELCa wJEZ4xliUNCCG6hcs5cvS7vdAf18q/fivZmTIQve+9BRdS/b5a6mT7NOQ4Wn2oTgJC8b FCvvBiE2vbUZrB+yyEbQxTsCm3dSH3xEVaBhcwc6HdV22yo+2j7SnMgvKCHnU0tvjEkS fOwpO97TmtodT3yPrZH7GBNw5zhV8GQPwFa/8XC+RiiKFRc6GzNhP72F8F8cCBAHO7iG B6lkOrYHTfVX7kuk0kgQXFiqDGSb9CN+IExX+aMHM5T4tPCAAdAuuzsxFRk/bAoOvRNJ AnTA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2n8/8Cm7mR6lwBynlCU7i7qRAbPVGGZk2VB72H7Lrdw=; b=f3NAw2LFjBWHwML10Avtc+4EHN8Anrp9RfDA4WY0eVsA/3W+gazkjpcnlGGTmQZS6P iRrw+RLeAtGhqwdeV7u8AFsKcjZTF1U+uEjHOFRQuwnjcDczfPHqnsPOtnpyd9ttkaoU yrFf227K6fq1M5hp/kqZjpFJVBnJOrwuLx0rMRo6hTp1STy97OgxI5ASa8ZoNUKnwnrL Kl/oAZkheLt1g0LXR9vlVSAMbhPi0D+OP1OAxmZuA2xHa4HoeYzsJ65hl3fCMbQc7B/m 3sIXMVOaFZBZZAFq0CYlGnHyIB/DJ263QP7KyEfNMjA9aiOS898a4RdriLS15l+vxGju tEqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiE1K/KjPY5FFVM3VS4nSS5kXMDMIUs/u2cYzkJ6iLjpaDk4Wrl TG65yQHlUghPnJGO+dkArg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AOwi7QARVpdFSQWVU5YXfOtfGT4JlVfUO0pgCC2It7Y2HoNQiay4crGsXXC9lNHg2ctS1HwB9daKxQ== X-Received: by 10.200.49.36 with SMTP id g33mr20518825qtb.221.1505226597573; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:29:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-173-67-36-61.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.67.36.61]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f4sm8053607qtg.35.2017.09.12.07.29.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 Sep 2017 07:29:56 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C0CCA68221; Tue, 12 Sep 2017 10:29:55 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87lglkcdy1.fsf@drachen> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136831 Archived-At: On 12/09/17 at 02:13pm, Michael Heerdegen wrote: > Mark Oteiza writes: > > > This is a patch implementing the above: if-let and when-let only take > > single tuple, while {if,when,and}-let* lose the single tuple special > > case. > > I wonder if we should mark if-let and when-let obsolete instead. > Because it is only a special case of the if-let* and when-let* forms > (with only one binding), so it is absolutely redundant. Also, I find > the new syntax breaking with the binding-list syntax of let confusing. > Finally, it would ease the transition for programmers: the modified > if-let and when-let break existing code, and it's not obviously for > programmers what's suddenly wrong. Sounds good to me.