From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Winston Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28403: 25.2; find-tag works, but xref-find-definitions Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:10 EDT Message-ID: <201709101910.v8AJAYs8018917@psr.com> References: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=fixed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1505070676 31414 195.159.176.226 (10 Sep 2017 19:11:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28403@debbugs.gnu.org, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 10 21:11:11 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7dL-0007fx-D8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 21:11:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54005 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7dQ-0000GO-VP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:11:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50454) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7dJ-0000G0-OI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:11:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7dG-00060d-Ii for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:11:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51017) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7dG-00060W-Ep for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7dG-00076Q-91 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <201709092240.v89MeFUo014854@psr.com> Resent-From: Winston Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:11:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28403 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28403-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28403.150507063627264 (code B ref 28403); Sun, 10 Sep 2017 19:11:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28403) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Sep 2017 19:10:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59697 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7cq-00075g-8o for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:10:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.psr.com ([67.212.42.216]:23316 helo=psr.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dr7co-00075U-3d for 28403@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:10:34 -0400 Original-Received: from psr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v8AJAYIU018918 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:10:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe@psr.com) Original-Received: (from wbe@localhost) by psr.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v8AJAYs8018917; Sun, 10 Sep 2017 15:10:34 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wbe) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136739 Archived-At: Eli kindly replied: > It is even possible that, given the details I requested above, I will > be able to help you get your use case working with xref, Just thought... (setq etags-leading-function-names true) ? to indicate that function names are always the first thing on their definition lines? The idea would be to have something one puts in a C file's Local Variables section, when such style is used. -WBE