From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28254: 26.0.50; SRFI-2 and-let* Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 00:14:24 -0400 Message-ID: <20170902041424.GA21189@holos.localdomain> References: <87a82kdb4e.fsf@holos> <87inh36sap.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> <20170902021043.GA7509@holos.localdomain> <878thx7qcc.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1504325720 437 195.159.176.226 (2 Sep 2017 04:15:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Sep 2017 04:15:20 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Cc: 28254@debbugs.gnu.org To: npostavs@users.sourceforge.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 02 06:15:14 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzpu-00080X-58 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 06:15:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50109 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzq0-0005iQ-Us for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:15:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzps-0005Xc-28 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:15:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzpn-0008B2-0e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:15:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60616) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzpm-0008Ar-Pf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:15:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzpm-0005XQ-Ga for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:15:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2017 04:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28254 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28254-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28254.150432567621236 (code B ref 28254); Sat, 02 Sep 2017 04:15:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28254) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Sep 2017 04:14:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzpM-0005WS-GQ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:14:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:33425) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dnzpI-0005WB-5j for 28254@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Sep 2017 00:14:34 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e2so8144753qta.0 for <28254@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:14:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zLp1/Xx2htDFDgo8zgfJ09jlDkWwkujQpMUigVnpfe8=; b=zLMsDUvDXryILIvExCZOqjrDgz5LQoUcsq8+bTM0cmcDEGwKcHydCvs3tmxDGAdiVR DJDBczdQ4EMF8OPRFuGCfj5nHTs6yynDWjvLnv9Xirdd1b686zgOwVDdtrz7JK4gWQfU VRMSK3LMTf4SXWU5TvABVX1Ehq6eqZ+G4pmqXk+fbuP33S3ubNR56f9IIoHoNZJRYev8 7LBQw76OpbIiaB+sXTHtPxThj5v7GtDkoAk1TTYQ2RMa6ZL9kfYOH5oiBCnB9JbPR5/S Y0jkjQWQj+zA+8ndBddoXUka6bhrhPyoz9fk1ggbFPi6L84KjkJ4m2HH4e6GmA8XEkr+ cIlw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=zLp1/Xx2htDFDgo8zgfJ09jlDkWwkujQpMUigVnpfe8=; b=CRdbwHraU9KwE3mn4zBW2B3y/g7oIyzIZNp4o+EV2Si4Fy9C/lUIjqS/V2CfhilEAu vBjABMay6aNd6FAxsW+olcQ0Ua7aPusIODRaB+AY5k36wjuXJARsK9O5Iy5P6jnD57G2 Jwn1iootjfKoJg9hw1YGa4+3QqWJk9FjZNOApWhEH0w9vzWHSTjsOnNKpb6a0ee4Ah7k A+vXb1LSfKZ+6gG3EFmA4c4GVwMCr6DdRiL9FxTxqdBltCNM73WjoFquQ1vC4hi3uKAC yQWxhLX/eF0NS4YOBRyIofysssZhJhSTKlR7POEAS3SVyJvsr0bwxjRMkpJBY9BfjZMP EOKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjYA1PjXh6HwKhTUJ5tGC3eMQx5z2P8l8wHJQFVxGu05QfHlrD4 2b41Wm8r//UMa5fxMT4nWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb5XCX++AOsdUeuu83QWe3V58FmOEdm31le4OMe5Fic0tbMbAw0TgCO1n0Db3E0aSQA3I3l2QQ== X-Received: by 10.200.25.16 with SMTP id t16mr5510913qtj.93.1504325666411; Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-173-64-88-95.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.64.88.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id m59sm1283684qte.61.2017.09.01.21.14.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 01 Sep 2017 21:14:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DEB4F69C52; Sat, 2 Sep 2017 00:14:24 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <878thx7qcc.fsf@users.sourceforge.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:136456 Archived-At: On 01/09/17 at 11:05pm, npostavs@users.sourceforge.net wrote: >Mark Oteiza writes: > >> (and-let* ((x ...) >> (y ...) >> ((x > y))) >> ...) > >I assume you meant (> x y), unless you've managed to somehow squeeze an >infix expression parser into that patch above ;) Ah yeah, I wish! >> I didn't try writing it in the style of if-let*--perhaps if-let* could >> be extended and all three macros would learn (EXPR). > >Yes, I think it's best if all foo-let* macros interpret the varlist in >the same way. Alright, I'll look at it.