From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25105: 26.0.50; diff navigation is broken Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:05:18 -0500 Message-ID: <20170107020518.GA19694@holos.localdomain> References: <87inpt6lce.fsf@gmail.com> <87tw9dc7bk.fsf@secretsauce.net> <87shoxc70l.fsf@secretsauce.net> <20170106030606.GB1101@holos.localdomain> <87lguovn5f.fsf@secretsauce.net> <83mvf4d3m9.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1483754776 25414 195.159.176.226 (7 Jan 2017 02:06:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:06:16 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2+14 (4f0a84b954ef) (2016-11-26) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , 25105@debbugs.gnu.org, Dima Kogan , npostavs@users.sourceforge.net To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 07 03:06:09 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgOV-0005Vm-7m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 03:06:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55607 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgOZ-0008Jd-9t for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:06:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48370) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgOU-0008JN-1o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgOQ-0007Up-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:58305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgOQ-0007UL-0D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgOP-0004E2-KX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 02:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25105 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25105-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25105.148375472716203 (code B ref 25105); Sat, 07 Jan 2017 02:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25105) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Jan 2017 02:05:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45471 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgNr-0004DH-Bi for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:05:27 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-qt0-f170.google.com ([209.85.216.170]:34715) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cPgNp-0004D4-FE for 25105@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:05:25 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-qt0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l7so45325169qtd.1 for <25105@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:05:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=l2cj4+antJVYEjbbUBUIr/X29VBqR0M9tQH6fgUreyU=; b=qj9EvLwPuiS/FHBN29cdKeQzuVAQ/4gM7tg9LXbFwrQiyjXtab8+fCa3bEFIRs7SUv v9VMtJRLZVAEOyo3CEupj8NnhasGQHT+ocMd3iSAjupp8eC1p2TIOOEwnH90RBsX7URi cYy7MfWd0ta74Iu0x483nvM378/6VvoXf+K/6fKNunk0xDJ0vacPVtF5pdHsbA9ZTkpk 0uM+dONs7yhiNNUOD96eOcaYDJTJvDS0x3nKpq1fEJ49U6U813iOFovus6mzJYo6dkPc ya5xcG5rp4jFeAM7JDMJJdol2Zvp5YQNWual3AJgCUgULMsQji48dG8JDz99zPxQdMCZ HObQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=l2cj4+antJVYEjbbUBUIr/X29VBqR0M9tQH6fgUreyU=; b=JVcZUnK+U7ZuizCj6No5kKIqpYnvXsXG7MotusZ5jNHCCCehTh75F6huLuF5ScCAkn 3gNetPbf2G6j9r7aNS0zT3ytJdLmo8JC4P674Bz4wt59PKzLwbITHpZDr3oUotWjzA66 ox3lwx5zYPTixv8IsYO7PT2C59e6c0ZZE5iqgmziAJwIOiB5N1l5Nit75/gBevi71mK3 bSAwhp44NbwdXRFJrtGzj/8la8sA/vT6hOWXKHBYpuMk3HKz1ut2tL4OPLqY5BCONN9S iBduLRkpJUuUYFRk0cQ/La4OI27tOB4/v6pkfeCVoJIdjVKtsBmzPVcM24p+FSTivjiA h6KA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJSSQIxWIlmlpHZA0GnDyOASGHMXmmP1R3v/mGuTgmvONE7CQ6Lv2odZPhs6DssXXWD X-Received: by 10.200.56.4 with SMTP id q4mr3787238qtb.73.1483754719966; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:05:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-173-67-40-97.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [173.67.40.97]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r8sm51726084qtc.32.2017.01.06.18.05.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:05:19 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9B00E60D64; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:05:18 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:127862 Archived-At: On 07/01/17 at 10:54am, Tino Calancha wrote: > On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Dmitry Gutov wrote: > > > I've honestly thought that Dima's patch's main purpose was to fix that > > bug. And everything else we now complain about are just implementation's > > side-effects. > > It seems you are right. IMO, we must aim to have the `C-c C-a' stuff fixed, > but preserving those behaviours that we are complaining here. > Until this aim is fulfilled, i would like to pospone this patch, or to have > a temporary solution as Mark's one in this thread. I don't consider my patch a solution, as it basically disables diff refinement due to the design of Dima's patch.