From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Pierre Lorenzon Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25129: 26.0.50; seq-some function Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:28:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <20161207.172842.539369297027198559.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> References: <20161207.090954.2116981160523579782.devel@pollock-nageoire.net> <87h96g5dlu.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481129177 27246 195.159.176.226 (7 Dec 2016 16:46:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2016 16:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25129@debbugs.gnu.org To: nicolas@petton.fr Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Dec 07 17:46:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfMB-0005yH-4l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:46:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40001 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfMF-0001bg-35 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:46:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfM8-0001bV-D7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:46:09 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfM2-0001Ey-S4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:46:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44056) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfM2-0001Eq-O8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfM2-0003Hi-HE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:46:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Pierre Lorenzon Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:46:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25129 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 25129-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25129.148112911512559 (code B ref 25129); Wed, 07 Dec 2016 16:46:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25129) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Dec 2016 16:45:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59454 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfLG-0003GV-VW for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:45:15 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp01.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.123]:37015 helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cEfLF-0003GB-Be for 25129@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 11:45:13 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([86.246.134.14]) by mwinf5d24 with ME id H4l41u0050JoMeW034l4Wn; Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:45:06 +0100 X-ME-Helo: localhost X-ME-Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 17:45:06 +0100 X-ME-IP: 86.246.134.14 In-Reply-To: <87h96g5dlu.fsf@petton.fr> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 26.0.50 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126615 Archived-At: From: Nicolas Petton Subject: Re: bug#25129: 26.0.50; seq-some function Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:48:29 +0100 > Pierre Lorenzon writes: > > Hi Pierre, > >> I well understand now that I must use seq-find instead of >> seq-some but I think that I will not be the only one being >> confused by these functions specifications ! > > There is a mistake (extra if) in the documentation, I will fix that. Good ! > > Other than that, is the following less confusing? > > Return non-nil if PRED returns non-nil for at least one element of SEQUENCE. > If so, return the value returned by PRED. Yes this is absolutely clear now from my point of view. I know taht this function has been first called seq-some-p then seq-(some and its spec has maybe changed as well. But now with your new documentation I htink that documentation fit function behavior. That's only what we need. The fact that function fit our own need is another question : in fact seq-find does ! Thanks ! Pierre > > Cheers, > Nico