From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22818: 25.1.1 Emacs.app crash ns_compute_glyph_string_overhangs Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:38:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20161119193845.GA36809@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <20161119100703.GA66661@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83k2bzbw8g.fsf@gnu.org> <20161119111823.GA66770@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83inrjbsq2.fsf@gnu.org> <20161119145336.GA591@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83d1hrbj71.fsf@gnu.org> <20161119155112.GB591@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83bmxbbaq0.fsf@gnu.org> <20161119190539.GA36653@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <83y40f9snb.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479584368 23360 195.159.176.226 (19 Nov 2016 19:39:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:39:28 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Cc: 22818@debbugs.gnu.org, josh@berdine.net To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 19 20:39:19 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTl-0003mi-GC for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 20:39:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTm-0008Aq-Qt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:39:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTf-0008AO-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:39:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTb-0001pu-18 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:39:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48164) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTa-0001pm-TS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTa-0003U8-IF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22818 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 22818-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22818.147958433513378 (code B ref 22818); Sat, 19 Nov 2016 19:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22818) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Nov 2016 19:38:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35330 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTT-0003Ti-9H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:38:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wj0-f169.google.com ([209.85.210.169]:35487) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c8BTR-0003TV-SC for 22818@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 14:38:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wj0-f169.google.com with SMTP id v7so9918064wjy.2 for <22818@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:38:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ulen1+mY328dwcXY89pVwNybPIYDxThSDqJecTzW36Y=; b=dt2gVxojStgELwXynOPgH9zcKjigXfGGJkyl36N7WheV3QgjrOfJSjZ6rwc/RNyPFk wD3nA6KGJBsUlbDNYdXsWaV9qnxAfeY4uGg4Clqn+E4gZB9HPS3p8cSZFOMr1AxpZNkI 7SmZHV12oNET/4IscVUBYoIeimvFGfidJv0ncI2aHJPiNBS8nOig1TbFVWMMZuVVtw41 gh5GP4W8eAIO7wHnMC7sLc5/0yObI9lDngyV4qTGQ5RSy/QoVKELiwSSKQ/Q/ow+hS0M HK40y3ov67yE7koE26DVYmu2dL3ghrB3M/tZyW+roL6OnBujnbm/MHkOF8QdzgJYnOG4 MCtA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=Ulen1+mY328dwcXY89pVwNybPIYDxThSDqJecTzW36Y=; b=MwjEIR5Fmx6dYMxd3cc+YtHSr2bfQA90feMd4jFVlVJHZyZ6ZdGHguPBcGB5jptbit 38Po8rKx7nQamL9jIF3UiFP2SPE30NITyMNV5UWvZBY2gqEQTKrZy2shKF0dlIu3IEka b/Sd8iIhO6+5oo1jD847uRjlg5Qy2WkJoTUYKdDWEeN1yqx3cm9NT228yY/0REg5H09f af+MZrOmEWcKm34lczF/eGdlBS6oxCX7KyUTAb+sDGArwaRraTKZKvTYXGFl83eh/j/7 aI5HlZMqls87jdOg7LoBW+IlFWYtyx3rirwJFGb3BMDmfzDWV5GEGjGDRqmBbM6RxK9i GNQA== X-Gm-Message-State: AKaTC03mnxWcPQ7eztI8HTP+tZEpTvW+buXlHw2WiDM6gktl64whT0CsQeGlf3Xv+hmsMg== X-Received: by 10.194.20.68 with SMTP id l4mr3777564wje.49.1479584328200; Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:38:48 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-6c02-5eab-bb15-1042.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:6c02:5eab:bb15:1042]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w8sm5774951wmw.4.2016.11.19.11.38.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:38:47 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83y40f9snb.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125883 Archived-At: On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 09:27:52PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > (gdb) p lface_id_to_name[17] > > $1 = 31008 > > (gdb) xsymbol > > $2 = (struct Lisp_Symbol *) 0x7ab8 > > Cannot access memory at address 0x7ac0 > > (gdb) p next_lface_id > > $3 = 84 > > Strange. What about other indices between zero and 83? Are they all > invalid symbols like this one? As far as I can see, yes. -- Alan Third