From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24678: Emacs crash on macOS 10.12 "Sierra": nextEventMatchingMask from background thread Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 23:53:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20161015225349.GA30802@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476572062 13266 195.159.176.226 (15 Oct 2016 22:54:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:54:22 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) Cc: 24678@debbugs.gnu.org To: Jean de Largentaye Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 16 00:54:18 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXqD-0001kk-RD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2016 00:54:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54363 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXqF-0007UC-QG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:54:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51911) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXq9-0007Tv-K6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXq6-00053Q-Is for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:54:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54909) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXq6-00053I-Dv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXq6-0005As-74 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:54:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24678 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24678-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24678.147657203719877 (code B ref 24678); Sat, 15 Oct 2016 22:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24678) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Oct 2016 22:53:57 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXq0-0005AX-Qq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:53:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:38525) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bvXq0-0005AL-0f for 24678@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 18:53:56 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f44.google.com with SMTP id d128so43817938wmf.1 for <24678@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:53:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=WIl9ALWFpdS0jW61oqMT3vZ7fg39f5GODzvfWMoFvJE=; b=hdSIWDEH8Se25ZgQe3EvsNQ0Yt3hsLS5pkAV3SufLgCF5jcieo5Mq0JFIkYmmDOUK9 EiLFo2a1gsXsWhhLAIWqFeKL9ojvltt/m5avj4kpSd0dtnMGufPfkpdxBKlNRInbp6tg iGQijZdYOHF+ZQU7HcewhzcFuh0zLnfOtEc9g+PAZYCLFMSSuLh4eYFRaW0F0YrgvDo1 ArVug95ChyzuxORKnHjrNWeBJSudquNC8CtZeXA/pZGdMK5JyfJjmrg0r8HHysqTshNO 2d/elLM5CDuK/uqi8nkkS3TiuL7Q2ikGJZs2FgfxKpoM6fCNI5WziYJybW56aO9C0iQh rKTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=WIl9ALWFpdS0jW61oqMT3vZ7fg39f5GODzvfWMoFvJE=; b=h4eDRkVABFFExZVhAY2pQpW31VyMtktx7U5AOiSmpSOfSTAuywUhA9qIjDulvgSDpM HWw5VWaXHzB+qo+9sCLxwI6Xq5S36hYpbCtcDVzpvFqTcsTSgiNeZxxhzDW5asWnZ53V XebQhueU5xE6BGO5NcXvsxVp4pc/A3s5NW28BPN8edNWqpv9yTZd4SAtwl+yR3OUKSdp CdHgCbODVEDt9cxAxmXi1eyBiXz954zU5NAozMyRwlnc5WC/lNrQuZ3PXIx5cRffOaQ0 o0h10vhxC9xjvjPXDs5vaZHXxfW4g2AaIWwjyAT77JREnEPROsDsZ1uP6VsoPrKDRcRO BtxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rn/+H+4nm8uusGz09kKNim7v4+WQUJC/lQgznAUm8JHaXjRZrDu0e+Xu0LREav0Kw== X-Received: by 10.194.106.169 with SMTP id gv9mr6794497wjb.129.1476572030431; Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:53:50 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-bd2f-7bb8-ca4a-269f.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:bd2f:7bb8:ca4a:269f]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q63sm5498568wma.2.2016.10.15.15.53.49 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 15 Oct 2016 15:53:49 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:124530 Archived-At: On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 07:44:01PM +0000, Jean de Largentaye wrote: > crashing in org.gnu.Emacs in deliver_fatal_thread_signal • Uncaught > Exception 'NSInternalInconsistencyException': nextEventMatchingMask should > only be called from the Main Thread!terminating with uncaught exception of > type NSException : at com.apple.AppKit in -[NSApplication(NSEvent) > shouldBeTreatedAsInkEvent:] + 0 > > Apparently, calling nextEventMatchingMask from a background thread is > risky, and this has been made an assert as on 10.12, hence the crash. Hi, is there any chance you could provide a full backtrace? I can’t tell where the problem is and can’t reproduce myself as I’ve not upgraded to 10.12 yet. -- Alan Third