From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23924: [PATCH] Only check for AppDefined events in OS X 10.10 (bug#23924) Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 20:31:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20160720193154.GA13432@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <39AC2AF3-C87A-4743-803D-155A9E35081A@play-bow.org> <20160713210345.GA89533@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <8EB60A1F-4CA4-4124-8F10-EFF7A58117E1@play-bow.org> <20160717141549.GA4881@breton.holly.idiocy.org> <6629E4B5-5D34-4840-B0A1-A62BA025C472@play-bow.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1469043211 22437 80.91.229.3 (20 Jul 2016 19:33:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 23924@debbugs.gnu.org To: Bob Halley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 20 21:33:21 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxFA-0003YV-1m for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 21:33:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36664 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxF9-0001Ja-87 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:33:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45739) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxEy-0001HP-19 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:33:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxEs-0004Lu-5e for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:33:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:46595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxEs-0004Lq-1Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:33:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxEr-0003fU-O1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23924 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 23924-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23924.146904312714037 (code B ref 23924); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 19:33:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23924) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2016 19:32:07 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58932 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxDz-0003eL-1x for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:32:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:35107) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bPxDv-0003dk-0j for 23924@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:32:05 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f65so187781136wmi.0 for <23924@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:32:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=OtUgqicOp1Fk4/LcGAjMD3w2egWnqN2jfWXIC2xBWho=; b=IgHw6FG+XYQdGpYGo5yHRPHa8VUlaOgROtyaI2QDkzNVvpFG7fTbOAQb6z2Nvw+Vx5 H4qTxwDwa6KSXyLzPvG9gnxU5wDKGkkqSE6gbv+9k3x42k35Teo5X0EoqvUAxVEffdO/ id4iM1K/uofd+t19wozmqz/1dNxELeaenQv6d/FPh3wWykGSylCIqndJ9a2IrBFpC9SQ 1BHJPuBjJJ7f7V9X47tRurvxGMCGhGkoPxTb6IjXifTha4z9y/s2e7i2XW0qif6AI4tI nxug1HFNTy9tNoerYNTm2EonOfKbLJaUTq0MaaagjJiKpAbFuA2Olfu7PVrmyiBm8VaF YiLA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=OtUgqicOp1Fk4/LcGAjMD3w2egWnqN2jfWXIC2xBWho=; b=YgiNCvKxtyqqMyTJpdGmTCdaHlNBVJo//ILQy83TQVg1FG2pxKkdEO8uxevFLpWJus 4HMuTF8fAJvLVRFIOnwT5oBVqsUJ8OUTGA56UxA1etawCc6EBP74VpAwlR7M58FB5Y+g Qb3mt7wV8Pkx1V748zfO9STzv3yWglKtdDbEftp8hhQxfKvcFiiWfM7tPs6/s3bP3AA4 FUPAPwq5dKnhGbVcG4CNOhG7PTaRC6cqIvS0nMyX55h95fVEAfuVO5Qo4+Ja1cGhorTr 5s1D+tqbbZ+FsbXrzPVK+6TAvmYjCWEaYSD40EtNzKbkUlZqgQOZxR56+6aAXB0Yo93b D7lw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tI56aDH33qAcr6jZmsiX090KU4PotJfZC8hznayalvR43NqSUkDprg32KVnEnhwsA== X-Received: by 10.194.254.227 with SMTP id al3mr3389835wjd.37.1469043117235; Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:31:57 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-3c58-f213-3cd9-9a60.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:3c58:f213:3cd9:9a60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v4sm2693212wjc.0.2016.07.20.12.31.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Jul 2016 12:31:56 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6629E4B5-5D34-4840-B0A1-A62BA025C472@play-bow.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:121330 Archived-At: On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 11:35:33AM -0700, Bob Halley wrote: > I have a concern about this patch now, as this morning my emacs, > running with it, simply froze and was unresponsive to any input. > This sounds like the description of 18993. I guess it’s back to the drawing board. :( > I didn't have any trouble when I made emacs just always send an > appdefined event instead of trying to figure out whether it might > have one sent already. Is this known to be bad somehow? Well, it seems to me that it could delay processing of input events in certain circumstances. It maybe wouldn’t be a big deal, but I don’t know for certain. -- Alan Third