From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Third Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22993: Potential fix/workaround for 22993 Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 17:19:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20160611161935.GA27002@breton.holly.idiocy.org> References: <56e3b195c3d99f7e00000000@polymail.io> <56e3cc76c3d99f7e00000001@polymail.io> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465662025 5132 80.91.229.3 (11 Jun 2016 16:20:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:20:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22993@debbugs.gnu.org To: Aaron Jensen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 11 18:20:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1bBlds-0004ew-FR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 18:20:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47732 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldr-0001an-He for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:20:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42616) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldm-0001ZU-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:20:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldi-0002ht-IU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:20:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:53253) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldi-0002hg-Eu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:20:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldi-0007N5-BG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:20:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Third Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:20:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 22993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22993.146566198628309 (code B ref 22993); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 16:20:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Jun 2016 16:19:46 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37357 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldR-0007MX-Ue for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:38431) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bBldQ-0007MK-KK for 22993@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:19:44 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-f47.google.com with SMTP id m124so27440975wme.1 for <22993@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7grBfPFZKACRhEjgkG33C6oDMC2l5PNIwKWUvhTPErg=; b=R7Ki6Qxzx4camnKagpJ9QbvH7HZmCFvbCG0pXPqoc//qSjpcr64kOEluvD/4ma1Sac HFc+iO+/D6WtlORtveqkLJiexGzGdhxY51M1g4KYe8PqcILeIPyhVVcUWRnAR3pYxhxd R/Hi++sc0E0QwXKeE6h6gHQCF++IQek9eHO4bnxJAdCxpTcjFmAgvUrenyCJnZfBu3ML VG63m1ZeeHxZaN4U/u6PVkrDUKeBY60q0SLJOjamCKH9/KwnSFzw4yhD3jBhCw5YDXAO tVck2MxB0XRAH2fGKT4sqY5JWElKbooqsQgw1LUT4QghUqV5utlppsNICeedxld38h26 0a5g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=7grBfPFZKACRhEjgkG33C6oDMC2l5PNIwKWUvhTPErg=; b=lHv8wDigsRSCZLNLxFwkTfLKHlIUpE0XTjY5QuimZ0+oJIMd0zJoeuZxt0I2nE13IY N1pl3Kc1HtUrQ5ZV2x2UqkE/PhgUAd2hN+viWHjjEwrzLV+B0LdIa9bW8VN0sb2LT6l8 d8Zulu2+85krn9tk0vtrOWNA3/waCMUDmVscUG9KQ64re3Z7LOoA4preoXdIcp2M1Wdq 0DXzljbEGpFoqDDq3fS/MoztuxU/JiPrnzs5jdVuIzIXjgYVI1efRIGgHJaISiAsWRFu DNLiYmSpCtlOgtIFUAsgSDu3MrVYkPOh6A4VHOep8jBq0yOjTieHZAEG1Ry8Z/s1UPnH q8jA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLUIZ5QroKAHgnB+F6XnEAMQjzrF2R6BL4YMAHvtxrk5CFJ37ixQhcM2s3rZhR18g== X-Received: by 10.28.217.146 with SMTP id q140mr4221545wmg.56.1465661978848; Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from breton.holly.idiocy.org (ip6-2001-08b0-03f8-8129-c9c2-157d-2620-d548.holly.idiocy.org. [2001:8b0:3f8:8129:c9c2:157d:2620:d548]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm17921790wjf.43.2016.06.11.09.19.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 11 Jun 2016 09:19:38 -0700 (PDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119427 Archived-At: On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 03:51:50PM +0000, Aaron Jensen wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:40 AM Alan Third wrote: > > > Hi Aaron, I can't replicate the bug on my machine because this seems to > > be exactly what happens. Are you still seeing this bug in a current > > build? > > > > Hi Alan, > > Yes, I can still repro with 25.0.95.1 on OS X 10.11.5. The following makes > it easier to repro: > > 1. Make sure your emacsclient is open already and it is displaying a buffer > that is not displayed by any window on the gui frame. > 2. Minimize the gui frame. > 3. Watch Activity Monitor until Emacs says App Nap: Yes > > At this point, typing in the terminal or running the function in the > original report should not wake up the app from App Nap. As far as I can > tell, the only thing that does is focusing the gui frame. I can reproduce this. I suspect that I was doing something that was causing the GUI window to update and that must have been bringing it out of App Nap. I don't actually see any performance issues, but that may just be because my PC is otherwise idle. -- Alan Third