From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22652: 25.1.50; backtrace Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:14:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20160213221453.GA23803@holos> References: <8737swmjjr.fsf@udel.edu> <83ziv449fs.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1455401786 11947 80.91.229.3 (13 Feb 2016 22:16:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22652@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 13 23:16:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiU8-0004hm-QU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 23:16:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45303 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiU8-0004Kk-0j for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:16:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54170) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiU3-0004Jr-Qs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:16:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiTy-0002nz-Qp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:16:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:47624) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiTy-0002nv-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:16:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiTy-0006YK-Gs for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:16:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:16:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22652 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22652-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22652.145540170325121 (code B ref 22652); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 22:16:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22652) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Feb 2016 22:15:03 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38399 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiT1-0006X7-8v for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.161.169]:34149) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aUiSz-0006WL-7Y for 22652@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:15:01 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f169.google.com with SMTP id h129so90437821ywb.1 for <22652@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:15:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=L20llr8tORU1vzr4Z679mR8xbqiLTslo6KxEF0WkNdc=; b=JwqMDwIi2i9R+6coSTuSSQBrPAjbLYqZU+RT9g6auIP4m9JHpKSgOSCgh5hcfUIVTP 03CSndGHrGsJ0eo/Ecz3BebIpVLCZVOvxQMrNZTocIdO5A36W9l1kH12tic4D9uCAwmg N1mb3GT8CR8YkSFz4KIsh2ECMvXW/CNrYtbPNZlIxvH94JpozgXWi5tIwuPAN3P8txel SZ0tWazZ6dndoEFBYxwXdryqeI+pf6y55dnH6PVXsfkth4rFs6BL5DseDdhmch9fcCjo 0zH8Y0PU91D6I0stNV91tgvLBb8XqCQr0fMgDs7PFXBBeJtebGYaJMOGVCKt6qvfdFR7 ChqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=L20llr8tORU1vzr4Z679mR8xbqiLTslo6KxEF0WkNdc=; b=OCexWaXn5f357kpkNKS+vY29E+YzJQwj7RNIpBWhGy3HGz8sW5Cm8n6LkrsSikhtVM 8hUzeOP3bTihBWvyK1pUV4MsdAXNqbZLSR326cJ6Je4Toq8cO4ID3FB99gmtcRutATVl vRmvSV/1SD72QJsyRom8u99liDmI432lJsDEgDZmeWKCDFK0ilUzSMFxjY6XHmtmR7Pj nMzaQQUsfxL9sAi/fT4dDc5tkl+X5vLfEeHmFCaE3Wy5whBW+xFrL9Li/DjdxrUB6tQ8 JXxn31ar8gXUD/vQkLh7hYTcFMs6BzM4ATKKIrbVo00ypfUC4fv+D5nnBR/c3DtIQNmj eAXA== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YORhcbqMCr2//lMeiGN6t/fwD1wxLwb+gkuegq89p5GudkjA9Kp5F65W4wxTwCxatbQm X-Received: by 10.129.145.208 with SMTP id i199mr5539244ywg.161.1455401696044; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:14:56 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-96-227-83-242.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [96.227.83.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x7sm15101847ywf.35.2016.02.13.14.14.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 13 Feb 2016 14:14:54 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 07EEA66225; Sat, 13 Feb 2016 17:14:54 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83ziv449fs.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+55 (e8f7a08cb7ac) (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:113000 Archived-At: On 13/02/16 at 10:55pm, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > From: Mark Oteiza > > Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 15:39:36 -0500 > > > > Sorry if this is related to my previous backtrace reports (bug#21660 and > > bug#21676), but I don't know what's going on in this bt beyond I guess > > the font cache being somehow corrupt. Perhaps it's related to #21428, > > but the traces in that thread look different (and hence I don't see the > > things that are requested). > > This isn't related to any of the other bug reports. > > Do you remember what you (or Emacs) were doing when this happened? I think I was just moving around a buffer, but I'm not sure. I know I had been using both graphical and terminal emacsclients, and in experimenting with that I repro'd bug#21676 ...