From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Oteiza Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#22570: 24.5; [debbugs 0.9] encoding issue Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 01:28:30 -0500 Message-ID: <20160206062830.GA11948@holos> References: <874mdmjtqm.fsf@udel.edu> <87wpqiqu2i.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1454740171 21183 80.91.229.3 (6 Feb 2016 06:29:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 06:29:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 22570@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 06 07:29:20 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMw-0002Ir-BO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 07:29:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51833 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMs-0004tN-D8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:29:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59800) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMo-0004ry-Ig for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:29:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMj-0002eI-J8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:29:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:54661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMj-0002e7-CM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:29:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMf-0004Jv-Pl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:29:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Mark Oteiza Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 06 Feb 2016 06:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 22570 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 22570-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B22570.145474012116581 (code B ref 22570); Sat, 06 Feb 2016 06:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 22570) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Feb 2016 06:28:41 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35017 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMK-0004JM-VO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:28:41 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-yw0-f171.google.com ([209.85.161.171]:34064) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aRwMI-0004J8-OK for 22570@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 06 Feb 2016 01:28:39 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-yw0-f171.google.com with SMTP id h129so69290244ywb.1 for <22570@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:28:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=udel-edu.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8o+fzuXks8bWHmXgjphMQvSz2Iv9Gdkif+0LIhgResY=; b=rqgD7oXr513aauL8W/3nx6m2wUCNzluGsR6nuuowuLSk+8GpR8oXfdU06//qzpUn/g MPHWTFtI6IRMf8PPRBcQ/N1uFLihUiwbMcc8GI645tbdf3wP4DnSZPabojh86SgmaHtf US+/sBiqePMiG8lejc5gRZ1MCu6F+EZadLFEhna83jOKbqLaizBZKDBJWgl7oNF1I5iP 4jCOeJOVN1V1OdhLyr2p2Ca+rBdLI9fd+sXcGTEFTea4jyG0PzmWJWU5pDGPECyGgr0R 9KS4JZRH5hbiSDb5Dp9bL0OJP69zdNdzJwJd3p4pjO0JrDTi4Fu2LbsiKX7wAl6G43Xa jS1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8o+fzuXks8bWHmXgjphMQvSz2Iv9Gdkif+0LIhgResY=; b=BDJLZW22t3qy5I4eH1S8FIrygun4w32lBLQRyTcLnaQEn8Gu9nw4GHva2GNdWE3F/q O/lR2pp5PMHV8xbHCQNnyZ8CKLhQGnDmjH0VfTNvIczVIj4VFKHSPh89b35uut/kbpPO ZB4gKTiHeUpcu9OhAGFDo+F/sF2Wem+gXTwF1k54UP+8VfwQNkjLEjilREy1RMuAy+LP 00X2VusU+zXMYqYCQXNApwQf8wPMYEvrgcs5Mw9CIYNXJ6kYuVxaeOEFkVB/CP7BUMxx X73G5LF3lvV34A3QaeF7TZ9+AatHNUANYZw3JhQxyYwc41akhwNhNU2TVN7M+/wnPawO 9HKg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSOy6GZL8XPGiuZdNsD/7st9lFq7yo305F2U2BOGJn069cxHg6Ql980UQ1cxKxhGYWU X-Received: by 10.129.79.201 with SMTP id d192mr8774017ywb.159.1454740113254; Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:28:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from holos.localdomain (pool-96-227-83-242.phlapa.fios.verizon.net. [96.227.83.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f186sm13411441ywa.6.2016.02.05.22.28.31 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:28:31 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by holos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DF079696E3; Sat, 6 Feb 2016 01:28:30 -0500 (EST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87wpqiqu2i.fsf@gnus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+55 (e8f7a08cb7ac) (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:112547 Archived-At: On 06/02/16 at 04:36pm, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Mark Oteiza writes: > > > With debbugs 0.9, doing M-x debbugs-gnu RET results in unknown symbol > > spam (see Recent messages: below). > > > > As an example, the first obvious problem I see in the *Emacs Bugs* > > buffer is > > > > 22549 normal [Óscar Fuentes ] 25.0.50; Tooltips placed outside of screen limits > > I think Andreas fixed this in async.el in ELPA. But perhaps a new > version hasn't been pushed? What's required to do that? Just update > the version number? Oh, I see--thanks for pointing that out. Alas, I don't know the workings of ELPA.