From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ilya Zakharevich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19993: 25.0.50; Unicode fonts defective on Windows Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:05:02 -0800 Message-ID: <20150305220502.GA4096@math.berkeley.edu> References: <20150303220228.GA28969@math.berkeley.edu> <83egp4prs3.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1425593185 30798 80.91.229.3 (5 Mar 2015 22:06:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 22:06:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19993@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 23:06:12 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YTduF-0003b5-0T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:06:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55176 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTduE-00055g-AE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:06:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60146) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTduA-00054b-5n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:06:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTdu6-0007I3-Vt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:06:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37934) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YTdu6-0007Hz-RU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:06:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTdu6-0000wb-Ck for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:06:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Ilya Zakharevich Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19993 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19993-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19993.14255931133556 (code B ref 19993); Thu, 05 Mar 2015 22:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19993) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2015 22:05:13 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:36502 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTdtI-0000vI-7A for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:05:12 -0500 Original-Received: from nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com ([98.137.176.72]:41069) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YTdtG-0000v0-Kk for 19993@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2015 17:05:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1425593104; bh=yNHXk20fHoGimyooFD2JejYUcqOzf2/rbCypeWF4l8Q=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=E7xBNKrRX5xdK0U2foe9TlogRmpkhGSdqYYkoo7j0yL8yB1dt4QT2GTl3NT8v0T7ZXxvrf9XAU1IGpDp1KzT5kHhtxlDmrB73SJVp+wDtB01P977bCGK6hWvtzGSDX3nSCFUGO1lNqCrCVBFRvgJ6AN2N/Kaajjst52LDeFYhJrHJgR7EVMW1GdwzDe3Q1osIpxF12dnyX+FksS44Szs7t6xknmex2tp2ObTx24w5UN/myXL3Pms+kegbZ6K1qRaR407OGwI3h7pod0Xtk726PbytQ59xDnOuxGqIpImq0f/zsBFU/2k+9hVhDp2ASK6Ke47QBpNu4mZTbJV7YWMbA== Original-Received: from [216.39.60.183] by nm15.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Mar 2015 22:05:04 -0000 Original-Received: from [208.71.42.209] by tm19.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Mar 2015 22:05:04 -0000 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp220.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 05 Mar 2015 22:05:04 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 722114.44941.bm@smtp220.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: DIEM2XYVM1nal2uHvexYhODmjD.VLr5Iqpun3MuhiwuaYnw n6yKAxDB01IXZTm7IMfWxDPPwf5l7j2sYZJhyIc4DiWhP.XplRwL9wHI89PN vJRiNqYqIaWoNx3cmU7BTE.EJw_iboHwVZ0nkFoHoB4gCXLgj7Iq.W7JoB20 f9EaueVXsaNBRrYaWkCO31MgzAnP1ZQ65jcJbm5u7WXQM1wDgO8.UJXbjt0h FL2y4KQiA_xPm9BlMk7BW3s89_YBByhv6VZ56wEkxKdAW8n7qim0AaNiTg0Y F5K7lgrXWvDvZQ3C51DcCGsbAlxFWxieNHAngSQryUxqMSaYtjIChnEEt87w tpsI4oMEU3Wcfshb5zx0RKlC3uWhR15QJen.aD9_5xQ3IJE29iMcMVC9z7nt 6LIN5CXbljcLsfl0qOS5HInwOB01TF9t2ipggtLfKi4qgXEjH3k5IbKy.xL4 hKxfmItRlMeAqw9DXihyZ_jm99ER45KNIcfbIET9IwWCQWN65zkp05iPKnEF xKsakRZKXmiwEdVUDyfgI6kKsNavl0nADmGZ7XNPfwYMbr1Ff3_aLPWSpHtc _OfHMn4pExjzEQVqjLahVkX.2jvuttV39RuZ9qg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: oLSY3dWswBBqoBVzCkLl_RIsw6heKMxu8wpEbARv1SU- Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <83egp4prs3.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:100116 Archived-At: On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 07:59:56PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 14:02:28 -0800 > > From: Ilya Zakharevich > > > > (A) On Windows, most Unicode characters won’t be shown, even if the system > > has (many) fonts covering the characters (and these fonts are listed in > > `font-log'!). > > Examples, please: they are required to debug the issue. Please > include with the examples the information about the font(s) which > support the problematic characters, but are not used although > installed. Or, if you already debugged this and can tell which code > misbehaves, please post that information. I won’t be able to debug this. However, I just take the MOST IMPORTANT font (plug plug! See ilyaz.org/fonts ;-] ), and grep for it in the result of `font-show-log' (family = «Unifont Smooth»; it is usable, and has all the glyphs for BMP of Unicode 7.0): grep -B 3 -A 3 Smooth- font-show-log-post >font-show-log-post-Smooth I see several occurences: -outline-FangSong-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-SimHei-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-KaiTi-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* w32font-list: -outline-*-mono-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-GungsuhChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -- -outline-FangSong-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-SimHei-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-KaiTi-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* list: -outline-*-mono-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-GungsuhChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -- -outline-FangSong-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-SimHei-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-KaiTi-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-BatangChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-GungsuhChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -outline-GulimChe-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-gb2312.1980*-* -- uniscribe-list: -outline-*-mono-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* w32font-list: -outline-*-mono-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* list: -outline-*-mono-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-MS Mincho-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* -outline-Unifont Smooth-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* sort-by: -*-normal-normal-normal-*-13-* uniscribe:-outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* open: -outline-MS Gothic-normal-normal-normal-mono-*-c-*-jisx0208*-* but only with some specialized encodings (instead of iso10646). How comes? Would not this explain why the glyph is not shown? Thanks, Ilya