From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Anthony Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15599: [PATCH] Inferior Lisp Mode Menu Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:47:01 +0100 Message-ID: <20131023214701.GA8211@jo.hnanthony.com> References: <20131012170846.GA688@jo.hnanthony.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382564896 28997 80.91.229.3 (23 Oct 2013 21:48:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15599@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 23 23:48:19 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Hq-0006dd-2M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 23:48:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51531 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Hp-0003H3-Et for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:48:17 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Hg-0003Gr-Am for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:48:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Ha-0006WT-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:48:08 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53213) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Ha-0006WL-6y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6HZ-0004OV-MY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: John Anthony Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15599 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 15599-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15599.138256482616813 (code B ref 15599); Wed, 23 Oct 2013 21:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15599) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Oct 2013 21:47:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38998 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Gf-0004N6-5e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:47:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [198.46.132.138] (port=47710 helo=jo.hnanthony.com) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VZ6Gd-0004My-0l for 15599@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:47:03 -0400 Original-Received: from jo.hnanthony.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by jo.hnanthony.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id r9NLl1QS008264; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:47:01 +0100 Original-Received: (from john@localhost) by jo.hnanthony.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id r9NLl1aW008263; Wed, 23 Oct 2013 22:47:01 +0100 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79557 Archived-At: On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 10:48:11PM -0400, Glenn Morris wrote: > > Thanks. Please send a reminder when you hear your copyright assignment > is complete. My copyright assignment is complete. A quick question of style before I submit a patch with your suggestions applied; should I check that a user is going to use a menu option correctly and, if not, disable it? Disabling it seems to improve tidiness but can also hide important feedback. To use a working example, should I disable "Eval Last Sexp" in the menu if the cursor is not positioned after a valid sexp? It feels like it would be better for a person to see the error (i.e. Scan error: "Unbalanced Parenthesis"). -- John Anthony