From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15465: CC-mode misaligns enums that implement an interface in Java Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:37:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20131020143707.GB3484@acm.acm> References: <20130928173323.GA11317@acm.acm> <20130929150345.GD3161@acm.acm> <20131013213838.GB2498@acm.acm> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1382280027 21063 80.91.229.3 (20 Oct 2013 14:40:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:40:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15465@debbugs.gnu.org To: Paul Pogonyshev Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 20 16:40:30 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VXuBC-0001Nk-36 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 16:40:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36352 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXuBB-0001mG-P5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:40:29 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56916) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXuB1-0001m2-8o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXuAt-0002uC-Qj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:40:19 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45215) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VXuAl-0002kx-Qh; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXuAk-0003MI-P4; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:40:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15465 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 15465-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15465.138227995212831 (code B ref 15465); Sun, 20 Oct 2013 14:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15465) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2013 14:39:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59234 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXu9w-0003Ks-0e for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:39:12 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:52900 helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VXu9r-0003Kh-9M for 15465@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 20612 invoked by uid 3782); 20 Oct 2013 14:39:05 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD951BC97.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.81.188.151]) by colin.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Oct 2013 16:39:04 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 5483 invoked by uid 1000); 20 Oct 2013 14:37:07 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.12 (Macallan) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:79421 Archived-At: Hello, Paul. On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 11:19:39AM +0200, Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > Um, it seems to be worse than before. I guess your first patch worked > better, at least for my cases. > E.g. now I have: > public enum X implements Y, Z > { > A, > B; > } Ah, yes, comma separated lists. I've committed another fix, revision #114729, that perhaps gets it right now. Would you please do the usual. > On a side note, enum methods (and constructors --- yes, enums can > optionally have those) are fontified as variable names, though that is of > course less important than indentation. It still needs to be fixed. Thanks for the pointer. > Paul -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).