From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Martin Rudalics" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10296: 24.0.92; check_glyph_memory still aborting Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:56:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20111216095654.138360@gmx.net> References: <4EE8548C.9030901@gmx.at> <8339cm2frk.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1324029461 24566 80.91.229.12 (16 Dec 2011 09:57:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10296@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 16 10:57:36 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUXk-0004UR-K1 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:57:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45156 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUXk-0000dH-8n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:53942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUXh-0000dB-L8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:57:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUXg-0006zA-Gm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:57:29 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39611) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUXg-0006z6-Cf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUZC-0003Ll-C6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:59:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Martin Rudalics" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10296 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 10296-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10296.132402951412843 (code B ref 10296); Fri, 16 Dec 2011 09:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10296) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Dec 2011 09:58:34 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUYj-0003L6-VD for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:58:34 -0500 Original-Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net ([213.165.64.22]) by debbugs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RbUYh-0003Kw-Hk for 10296@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:58:32 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 1079 invoked by uid 0); 16 Dec 2011 09:56:55 -0000 Original-Received: from 62.47.38.93 by www023.gmx.net with HTTP; Fri, 16 Dec 2011 10:56:54 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <8339cm2frk.fsf@gnu.org> X-Authenticated: #14592706 X-Flags: 0001 X-Mailer: WWW-Mail 6100 (Global Message Exchange) X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+dAIQKfYudyKqx5LOgUyv3U/1n28GTdx4kKTvnMG UPO8KmyE7g1wLCXamNYUADNUvRMtx6knKguw== X-GMX-UID: sXCZbmhXeSEqaqPJtXQhI0x+IGRvbwAm X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 04:59:02 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:55005 Archived-At: > This is not the same bug. As you noticed I _was_ reluctant to reopen the old bug ;-) > If you type "C-]" to exit the debugger, and then "C-x C-c", then Emacs > exits normally without aborting. Yes. I had tried that when looking for a simpler recipe. > If this is by design, I could easily avoid this abort when > command_loop_level is non-zero, if that's TRT to do. IMHO the fact that the abort dialogue pops up is not TRT. martin -- NEU: FreePhone - 0ct/min Handyspartarif mit Geld-zurück-Garantie! Jetzt informieren: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/freephone