From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steve Revilak Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8122: More regression notes for bug#8122 Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:05:24 -0500 Message-ID: <20110226150524.GC6286@srevilak.net> References: <20110226143116.GB6286@srevilak.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298732830 23758 80.91.229.12 (26 Feb 2011 15:07:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:07:10 +0000 (UTC) To: 8122@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 26 16:07:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLjd-0006IK-20 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 16:07:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55162 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtLjc-00080k-Aa for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:07:04 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=49137 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PtLjO-0007xl-Ud for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:06:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLjK-0001nX-7Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:06:51 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLjK-0001nO-2d for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:06:46 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLib-0005tX-RD; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:06:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Steve Revilak Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:06:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8122 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8122-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8122.129873273622624 (code B ref 8122); Sat, 26 Feb 2011 15:06:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8122) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 Feb 2011 15:05:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLiB-0005sr-B2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:05:35 -0500 Original-Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net ([69.17.117.41]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PtLi9-0005sb-7Y for 8122@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:05:33 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 25375 invoked from network); 26 Feb 2011 15:05:27 -0000 Original-Received: from pool-98-110-160-36.bstnma.fios.verizon.net (HELO srevilak.net) (srevilak@[98.110.160.36]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for <8122@debbugs.gnu.org>; 26 Feb 2011 15:05:26 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2011 10:06:01 -0500 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:44384 Archived-At: --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline I've tried to reproduce bug 8122 on pretest versions 23.2.92 and 23.2.93. Here are my findings: Bug 8122 occurs in 23.2.94. Bug 8122 DOES NOT occur with 23.2.91, 23.2.92, or 23.2.93. So, this appears to be new behavior in 23.2.94. --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (GNU/Linux) iEUEARECAAYFAk1pFrQACgkQX7YJI4BuyDSwDACeOlstp9XYyIuML89NZTyLxEzI oR8Al2CZkzs0cQVXa5+N7PBog1u2QD0= =d2iG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zCKi3GIZzVBPywwA--