From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Schnerring Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6963: More usecases, patch attached Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:01:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20100929180129.GB6325@elzar.ws.whq.gocept.com> References: <201009011216.17097.arne_bab@web.de> <20100929060918.GB9654@elzar.ws.whq.gocept.com> <20100929150805.GA6325@elzar.ws.whq.gocept.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285783898 24104 80.91.229.12 (29 Sep 2010 18:11:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6963@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 29 20:11:37 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P117t-00061f-Lu for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:11:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34295 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P117s-0006LO-T8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:11:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36289 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P117k-0006Jx-Qf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:11:25 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P117j-0003Ag-J5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:11:24 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:45504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P117j-0003Ac-Hn for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:11:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P10vm-0007RA-40; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Wolfgang Schnerring Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:59:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6963 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6963-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6963.128578312028581 (code B ref 6963); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:59:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6963) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Sep 2010 17:58:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P10vP-0007Qw-Lt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from pharos.wosc.de ([85.214.124.141]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P10vN-0007Qr-PI for 6963@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:58:38 -0400 Original-Received: from hlle-4db837f5.pool.mediaways.net ([77.184.55.245] helo=elzar.ws.whq.gocept.com) by pharos.wosc.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P10y9-00031F-Pg; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:01:29 +0200 Original-Received: from wosc by elzar.ws.whq.gocept.com with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P10y9-0007Cm-Sa; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:01:29 +0200 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:59:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:40552 Archived-At: * Juanma Barranquero [2010-09-29 17:43]: > In this case, the patch changes the behavior of emacsclient, so even > if it fixes a bug, it could still affect users of emacsclient in > non-obvious ways (because, as you do, they could be using emacsclient > from scripts, tools, etc.). So I'd say it's best to keep this for the > trunk. Yes, this change is "backwards incompatible", since, well, Emacs errors will then return nonzero, duh ;-), and that might not match current expectations. Anyway, it's your call, not mine. Wolfgang