From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Mackenzie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#6688: Acknowledgement (23.2; Auto-fill broken in C/C++ modes.) Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:18:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20100725161856.GA1648@muc.de> References: <20100725130939.GA1141@muc.de> <4C4C3D8E.5000101@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1280075865 23353 80.91.229.12 (25 Jul 2010 16:37:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 6688@debbugs.gnu.org, Matthieu Moy To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 25 18:37:43 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4Cs-0007dd-N7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:37:43 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42892 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Od4Cs-0006D5-2n for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:37:42 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=46884 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Od4Ck-00069a-D1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:37:35 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4Cj-00037X-BP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:58419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od4Ci-000370-28; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:37:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od3k9-0001PY-Sl; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:08:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Alan Mackenzie Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bug-cc-mode@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:08:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 6688 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,cc-mode X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 6688-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B6688.12800740755418 (code B ref 6688); Sun, 25 Jul 2010 16:08:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 6688) by debbugs.gnu.org; 25 Jul 2010 16:07:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od3k2-0001PL-ET for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:07:54 -0400 Original-Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1] helo=mail.muc.de) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Od3k0-0001PF-E0 for 6688@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:07:53 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 66529 invoked by uid 3782); 25 Jul 2010 16:07:54 -0000 Original-Received: from acm.muc.de (pD9E22C10.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.44.16]) by colin2.muc.de (tmda-ofmipd) with ESMTP; Sun, 25 Jul 2010 18:07:52 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1776 invoked by uid 1000); 25 Jul 2010 16:18:56 -0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C4C3D8E.5000101@gmx.at> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA/1.1.5 (Fettercairn) X-Primary-Address: acm@muc.de X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 12:08:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:38915 Archived-At: Hi, Martin, On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 03:35:10PM +0200, martin rudalics wrote: > > Apologies for omitting the patch. Here it is: > Thank you, applied. Is it sufficient to just recompile cc-cmds.el or > do we have to recompile all cc-*.el files? No, just compiling cc-cmds.el should do, since it's a "top level" file which doesn't suply macros etc. to the rest of cc-*.el. > martin -- Alan Mackenzie (Nuremberg, Germany).