From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1988: Making the license statement visible in the Emacs Manual Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:50:58 -0600 Message-ID: <200902161750.n1GHowk20892@f7.net> References: <121437e98bbd1dc9dba1e83152205de2@netwood.net> Reply-To: Karl Berry , 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234807506 574 80.91.229.12 (16 Feb 2009 18:05:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:05:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com To: jessw@netwood.net Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 16 19:06:20 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LZ7q8-0001vD-7k for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:05:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:44145 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ7oo-0005pd-A4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ7oi-0005pN-Tx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:40 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ7oh-0005p3-CF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52542 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LZ7oh-0005p0-2J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:39 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:52720) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LZ7og-000290-Ej for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:38 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1GI3ZfG006791; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:03:35 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n1GI03w5005664; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:00:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:00:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1988 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,documentation X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1988-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1988.12348066664422 (code B ref 1988); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:00:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1988) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 16 Feb 2009 17:51:06 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from f7.net (server1.f7.net [64.34.169.74]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n1GHp286004416 for <1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:51:04 -0800 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org X-Envelope-To: 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id n1GHowk20892; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 11:50:58 -0600 In-Reply-To: <121437e98bbd1dc9dba1e83152205de2@netwood.net> X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:03:40 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:25339 Archived-At: And that's it... all the others are included in the big-pile-o-patch attached below. Thanks. I finally made the changes, inserting some @ifnottex's, consistently putting the @insertcopying at the end of the Top node, etc. While I was at it, I made the @contents and @direntry usage consistent too. Do you have any suggestions about which projects would be most receptive? I expect any project will be receptive if you send an actual patch. I've sent a lot of patches to a lot of Texinfo manuals over the years and they've never been anything but gratefully received :).