From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1988: Making the license statement visible in the Emacs Manual Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:37:42 -0600 Message-ID: <200902011437.n11Ebga14058@f7.net> References: Reply-To: Karl Berry , 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1233500721 19168 80.91.229.12 (1 Feb 2009 15:05:21 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:05:21 +0000 (UTC) To: jessw@netwood.net, 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 01 16:06:34 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LTdsa-0000FQ-Bb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:05:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46286 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTdrH-0004nm-PR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:03:39 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTdrD-0004m0-JT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LTdrC-0004lJ-3T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:03:35 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=55177 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LTdrB-0004lE-VE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:03:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:48019) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTdrB-0007cV-9w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:03:33 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n11F3UUk029942; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 07:03:31 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id n11Ej3h4025137; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:45:03 -0800 X-Loop: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry) Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs , owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:45:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: owner@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: followup 1988 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs,documentation X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1988-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1988.123349906623893 (code B ref 1988); Sun, 01 Feb 2009 14:45:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1988) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 1 Feb 2009 14:37:46 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.5 Bayes not run. spammytokens:Tokens not available. hammytokens:Tokens not available. Original-Received: from f7.net (server1.f7.net [64.34.169.74]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n11Ebhhx023887 for <1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 06:37:44 -0800 X-Envelope-From: karl@freefriends.org X-Envelope-To: 1988@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com Original-Received: (from karl@localhost) by f7.net (8.11.7-20030920/8.11.7) id n11Ebga14058; Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:37:42 -0600 In-Reply-To: X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:03:35 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:24796 Archived-At: Jesse, Simply adding @insertcopying seems best to me, but any of the alternatives are fine. If it would help, I'd be happy to make patches for the various manuals. Since evidently no one else has a strong opinion, I suggest we go with the plain @insertcopying. It would be great if you could prepare the patches. Thanks.