From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1298: allow 'emacsclient -a "emacs --daemon && emacsclient -c"' Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:28:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <200812111928.mBBJSTJb000934@mothra.ics.uci.edu> References: <200811021818.mA2IIFMq028772@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812080754.mB87sXSV016391@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812081709.mB8H9T2m017554@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812082020.mB8KKnf2018098@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812091858.mB9IwW8K022220@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812100758.mBA7wlR5024667@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812101503.mBAF3d2p025533@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812111708.mBBH8seW000410@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Dan Nicolaescu , 1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229024759 11839 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2008 19:45:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Juanma Barranquero To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 20:47:04 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LArUy-0004y3-N5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:47:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40935 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LArTn-0007GG-7S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:45:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LArSQ-0006V8-EZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:44:22 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LArSP-0006UB-M4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43337 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LArSP-0006Tw-8c for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:44:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:38852) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LArSO-0002SF-H6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:44:20 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBBJiI2Q022041; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:44:18 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBBJZ46t018768; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:35:04 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:35:04 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1298 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1298-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1298.122902372616849 (code B ref 1298); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:35:04 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 13; hammy, 118; neutral, 52; spammy, 9. spammytokens:0.999-1--dislike, 0.998-1--continuous, 0.987-1--tolerate, 0.987-1--badgering, 0.944-+--his hammytokens:0.000-+--emacs, 0.000-+--H*i:message, 0.000-+--H*i:2008, 0.000-+--stefan, 0.000-+--HX-Debbugs-No-Ack:yes Original-Received: (at 1298) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Dec 2008 19:28:46 +0000 Original-Received: from sallyv2.ics.uci.edu (sallyv2.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.120]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBBJShgF016831 for <1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:28:44 -0800 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by sallyv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.7+Sun/8.13.7) with ESMTP id mBBJSUip022590; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:28:30 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by mothra.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id mBBJSTJb000934; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:28:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:06:20 -0500") Original-Lines: 19 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: mBBJSUip022590 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 14:44:21 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23200 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > I think you got it wrong here. I wrote the code, Juanma just sprinkled > > a few #ifdefs to simply disable it on windows, nothing else. He knew > > clearly well what my taste is. Given that I get to fix bugs in the > > code, I prefer for it to be done in the way I think it's right. > > I know you disagree, but he wrote the ifdefs, so the ifdefs are > his code. By that reasoning, should anyone feel free to change your code in a way we know you dislike and that would be fine? And you'd just let that stand? I don't think so. I would have done the changes to disable the code on windows, but Juanma was just quicker (so thanks, but no thanks) and intentionally chose to be confrontational, as seen from all his extremely aggressive followup emails and continuous misinterpretation and badgering. I don't like to tolerate bullies like that.