From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1298: allow 'emacsclient -a "emacs --daemon && emacsclient -c"' Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:08:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <200812111708.mBBH8seW000410@mothra.ics.uci.edu> References: <200811021818.mA2IIFMq028772@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812080754.mB87sXSV016391@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812081709.mB8H9T2m017554@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812082020.mB8KKnf2018098@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812091858.mB9IwW8K022220@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812100758.mBA7wlR5024667@mothra.ics.uci.edu> <200812101503.mBAF3d2p025533@mothra.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: Dan Nicolaescu , 1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1229017208 16079 80.91.229.12 (11 Dec 2008 17:40:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:40:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Juanma Barranquero To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 11 18:41:11 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LApX2-0001dM-1l for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:41:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LApVq-0002GL-Kg for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LApGy-00050h-AB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:24:24 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LApGv-0004z9-JE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:24:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33052 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LApGv-0004z1-7S for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu ([138.23.92.77]:45536) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LApGu-0002yd-NT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:24:21 -0500 Original-Received: from rzlab.ucr.edu (rzlab.ucr.edu [127.0.0.1]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBBHOIiw006360; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:24:18 -0800 Original-Received: (from debbugs@localhost) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id mBBHF2gX003233; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:15:02 -0800 X-Loop: don@donarmstrong.com Resent-From: Dan Nicolaescu Resent-To: bug-submit-list@donarmstrong.com Resent-CC: Emacs Bugs Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: don@donarmstrong.com X-Emacs-PR-Message: report 1298 X-Emacs-PR-Package: emacs X-Emacs-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 1298-submit@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com id=B1298.12290153521350 (code B ref 1298); Thu, 11 Dec 2008 17:15:02 +0000 X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 12; hammy, 134; neutral, 63; spammy, 5. spammytokens:0.951-+--concluded, 0.896-+--knew, 0.895-1--calm, 0.893-2--touched, 0.862-+--here hammytokens:0.000-+--emacs, 0.000-+--H*i:message, 0.000-+--H*i:2008, 0.000-+--stefan, 0.000-+--HX-Debbugs-No-Ack:yes Original-Received: (at 1298) by emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com; 11 Dec 2008 17:09:12 +0000 Original-Received: from barrelv2.ics.uci.edu (barrelv2.ics.uci.edu [128.195.1.114]) by rzlab.ucr.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id mBBH9As4001334 for <1298@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com>; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:09:11 -0800 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by barrelv2.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.8) with ESMTP id mBBH8sxw025504; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:08:55 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: (from dann@localhost) by mothra.ics.uci.edu (8.13.8+Sun/8.13.6/Submit) id mBBH8seW000410; Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:08:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2008 11:37:13 -0500") Original-Lines: 21 X-ICS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ICS-MailScanner-ID: mBBH8sxw025504 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:24:23 -0500 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:23187 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > > As you well know my taste is exactly not to add such #defines. There's > > not such #define in the daemon implementation in src, the new macro in > > undocumented, and your move was just designed as a provocation. > > Please, let's calm down. > > I generally agree that it's better to use "#ifdef " than > "#ifdef " (tho it always depends on the specifics), so to > a large extent I prefer Juanma's code in this case. But in any case, > when it's a question of taste, the one who wrote the code (Juanma in > this case, even if it touched the code you wrote) gets to choose. > Only ever change someone else's code when it's uncontroversial, or only > after a discussion here concluded it's better to change it. In this > case, it's clearly controversial. I think you got it wrong here. I wrote the code, Juanma just sprinkled a few #ifdefs to simply disable it on windows, nothing else. He knew clearly well what my taste is. Given that I get to fix bugs in the code, I prefer for it to be done in the way I think it's right.