unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2?
@ 2008-09-07 18:48 ` Karl Berry
  2008-09-07 20:40   ` bug#919: marked as done (distributions in lzma or bz2?) Emacs bug Tracking System
  2008-09-08  3:35   ` bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2? Stefan Monnier
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Karl Berry @ 2008-09-07 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bug-emacs

emacs-22.3.tar.gz is       39587396 bytes.
Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes.
(I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.)

That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved.  How about making it
available both ways, at least for next time?  (= install lzma-utils from
http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the automake
options.)

Best,
karl







^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* bug#919: marked as done (distributions in lzma or bz2?)
  2008-09-07 18:48 ` bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2? Karl Berry
@ 2008-09-07 20:40   ` Emacs bug Tracking System
  2008-09-08  3:35   ` bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2? Stefan Monnier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Emacs bug Tracking System @ 2008-09-07 20:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Chong Yidong

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]


Your message dated Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400
with message-id <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
and subject line distributions in lzma or bz2?
has caused the Emacs bug report #919,
regarding distributions in lzma or bz2?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact don@donarmstrong.com
immediately.)


-- 
919: http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=919
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact don@donarmstrong.com with problems

[-- Attachment #2: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 2807 bytes --]

From: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
To: bug-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2?
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2008 13:48:33 -0500
Message-ID: <200809071848.m87ImXL08116@f7.net>

emacs-22.3.tar.gz is       39587396 bytes.
Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes.
(I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.)

That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved.  How about making it
available both ways, at least for next time?  (= install lzma-utils from
http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the automake
options.)

Best,
karl




[-- Attachment #3: Type: message/rfc822, Size: 1334 bytes --]

From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
To: karl@freefriends.org (Karl Berry)
Cc: 919-done@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
Subject: distributions in lzma or bz2?
Date: Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:37:21 -0400
Message-ID: <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>

> emacs-22.3.tar.gz is       39587396 bytes.
> Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes.
> (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.)
>
> That could be a lot of download bandwidth saved.  How about making it
> available both ways, at least for next time?  (= install lzma-utils
> from http://tukaani.org/lzma/download and add dist-lzma to the
> automake

OK, I've made a not to do that.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2?
  2008-09-07 18:48 ` bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2? Karl Berry
  2008-09-07 20:40   ` bug#919: marked as done (distributions in lzma or bz2?) Emacs bug Tracking System
@ 2008-09-08  3:35   ` Stefan Monnier
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2008-09-08  3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Karl Berry; +Cc: 919

> emacs-22.3.tar.gz is       39587396 bytes.
> Compressed with lzma, it's 26752360 bytes.
> (I didn't check bzip2, presumably it's somewhere in between.)

lzma would make sense indeed.  It does seem to be the next standard
(contrary to bzip2 whose performance advantage over gzip wasn't enough
to replace it).


        Stefan






^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2008-09-08  3:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <87prnfae0u.fsf@cyd.mit.edu>
2008-09-07 18:48 ` bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2? Karl Berry
2008-09-07 20:40   ` bug#919: marked as done (distributions in lzma or bz2?) Emacs bug Tracking System
2008-09-08  3:35   ` bug#919: distributions in lzma or bz2? Stefan Monnier

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).