From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dan Nicolaescu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Segfault in Emacs 23 with multi-tty Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 10:16:33 -0800 Message-ID: <200712091816.lB9IGXw3007631@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1197224376 10983 80.91.229.12 (9 Dec 2007 18:19:36 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2007 18:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Daniel Hackney" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 09 19:19:46 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1Qkf-0002pq-5Y for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 19:19:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1QkN-0008RB-DO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:19:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1QkG-0008PR-BY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:19:16 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1QkB-0008HG-Cx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:19:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1QkB-0008HA-5T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu ([128.195.1.41]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1QkA-00066a-Ml for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Dec 2007 13:19:10 -0500 Original-Received: from mothra.ics.uci.edu (mothra.ics.uci.edu [128.195.6.93]) by oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id lB9IGXw3007631; Sun, 9 Dec 2007 10:16:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Hackney's message of "Fri, 7 Dec 2007 19:55:46 -0500") Original-Lines: 28 X-ICS-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ICS-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-1.44, required 5, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-ICS-MailScanner-From: dann@mothra.ics.uci.edu X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Solaris 9 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:17153 Archived-At: "Daniel Hackney" writes: > While testing the new multi-tty feature, I came across a segfault. I started up > an instance of emacs-snapshot in a terminal with the following command: > > $ emacs-snapshot -q -nw --eval "(setq server-name \"editor\")" -f server-start > > I then opened a second terminal and ran: > > $ emacsclient -s editor -e '(ignore)' > > The -e '(ignore)' is a no-op to give me a fresh frame. The second command opens > up a GTK frame connected to the first frame and both work just fine. The problem > comes when I try to kill the GTK frame. First, if I use > "save-buffers-kill-terminal", it kills the server in the terminal, which is not > what I want. "delete-frame" seemed to be the best choice. Unfortunately, when I > run "delete-frame" from the GTK frame, not only does the GTK frame close, but > the terminal frame (which is also the server) dies with a segfault: > > Fatal error (11)Segmentation fault (core dumped) Thank you for your bug report. This works fine for me for emacs checked today from the CVS branch emacs-unicode-2 (i.e. what you call Emacs 23). Please try a more up to date version and report again here if you have any problems.