From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs
Subject: Re: `print' does not print
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:06:29 -0600 (MDT)
Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <200204131906.g3DJ6Tt22926@aztec.santafe.edu>
References: <15520.45112.118124.712072@jupiter.akutech-local.de>
	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1020327074336.5838B-100000@is> <15521.35374.659644.387438@jupiter.akutech-local.de> <1659-Fri12Apr2002123712+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018728118 27988 127.0.0.1 (13 Apr 2002 20:01:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 20:01:58 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ralfixx@gmx.de, drk@sgi.com, bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Return-path: <bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([195.204.10.138])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16wTbQ-0006jp-02
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@gmane.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 21:54:28 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (fencepost.gnu.org [199.232.76.164])
	by hermes.netfonds.no (8.10.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g3DJ9Hf04635
	for <gnu-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org>; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 21:09:17 +0200 (CEST)
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16wStg-0004R2-00; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:09:16 -0400
Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16wSr1-0004Dn-00; Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:06:31 -0400
Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49])
	by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g3DJ6Ta23194;
	Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:06:29 -0600 (MDT)
Original-Received: (from rms@localhost)
	by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g3DJ6Tt22926;
	Sat, 13 Apr 2002 13:06:29 -0600 (MDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f
Original-To: eliz@is.elta.co.il
In-Reply-To: <1659-Fri12Apr2002123712+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
	the Swiss army knife of text editors <bug-gnu-emacs.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs>,
	<mailto:bug-gnu-emacs-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/bug-gnu-emacs/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:645
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:645

    I would like to resolve this issue for the next bugfix release (which
    means soon ;-).  It is my impression that removing the SGI-specific
    treatment of the `.got' sections from unexelf.c is a good idea, but
    I'm unsure whether it will have adverse effects on some (older?)
    versions of the SGI development tools, and if so whether saying in
    etc/MACHINES that users should upgrade to newer devo is good enough.

You could check the version number of these tools and conditionally
turn that off.

I don't know if that is worth doing.