From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: Re: Patch to emacs-21.2 enabling an underscore cursor Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:31:35 -0700 (MST) Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: <200204061731.g36HVZA19467@aztec.santafe.edu> References: Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1018114391 13374 127.0.0.1 (6 Apr 2002 17:33:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 17:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 16tu3r-0003Tb-00 for ; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 19:33:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16tu3m-00080J-00; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 12:33:06 -0500 Original-Received: from pele.santafe.edu ([192.12.12.119]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16tu2K-0006qx-00; Sat, 06 Apr 2002 12:31:36 -0500 Original-Received: from aztec.santafe.edu (aztec [192.12.12.49]) by pele.santafe.edu (8.11.6+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id g36HVZa11198; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:31:35 -0700 (MST) Original-Received: (from rms@localhost) by aztec.santafe.edu (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id g36HVZA19467; Sat, 6 Apr 2002 10:31:35 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: aztec.santafe.edu: rms set sender to rms@aztec using -f Original-To: dlambert@acm.org In-Reply-To: (message from Dave Lambert on Fri, 05 Apr 2002 12:01:02 -0500) Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.8 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:457 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.bugs:457 Thanks very much--this seems like something some users will want. Would you be willing to sign a disclaimer for your changes so we can use it? I've implemented the changes only for X: I don't know Win32, and couldn't test it if I did. I am glad you couldn't test it; I couldn't either. But you might not want to call it "Win". In hacker terminology, calling something a "win" is a form of praise. If you wish to praise Microsoft Windows, you're free to do so; but if you don't, then you might want to think twice about using the term "Win32".