unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
@ 2002-03-21 21:25 Nelson H. F. Beebe
  2002-03-22 13:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Nelson H. F. Beebe @ 2002-03-21 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: beebe

The configure-generated Makefile for elisp-manual-21-2.8 does not
conform to GNU standards: it lacks targets "all" and "check", causing
this standard recipe to fail:

	./configure && make all check install

The missing ones should be supplied, even though for this package,
they need do nothing.

See Emacs info node (make)Standard Targets for Users.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Nelson H. F. Beebe                    Tel: +1 801 581 5254                  -
- Center for Scientific Computing       FAX: +1 801 585 1640, +1 801 581 4148 -
- University of Utah                    Internet e-mail: beebe@math.utah.edu  -
- Department of Mathematics, 110 LCB        beebe@acm.org  beebe@computer.org -
- 155 S 1400 E RM 233                       beebe@ieee.org                    -
- Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0090, USA    URL: http://www.math.utah.edu/~beebe  -
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
  2002-03-21 21:25 elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards Nelson H. F. Beebe
@ 2002-03-22 13:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
  2002-03-22 13:41   ` David Kastrup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2002-03-22 13:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: bug-gnu-emacs

> From: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" <beebe@math.utah.edu>
> Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:25:41 -0700 (MST)
> 
> The configure-generated Makefile for elisp-manual-21-2.8 does not
> conform to GNU standards: it lacks targets "all" and "check", causing
> this standard recipe to fail:
> 
> 	./configure && make all check install

Thanks.

Since in future releases the ELisp manual will be distributed as part
of Emacs, I'm not sure this is something we need to fix.  What do you
think?

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
  2002-03-22 13:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2002-03-22 13:41   ` David Kastrup
  2002-03-22 14:29     ` Eli Zaretskii
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Kastrup @ 2002-03-22 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)


"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@is.elta.co.il> writes:

> > From: "Nelson H. F. Beebe" <beebe@math.utah.edu>
> > Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:25:41 -0700 (MST)
> > 
> > The configure-generated Makefile for elisp-manual-21-2.8 does not
> > conform to GNU standards: it lacks targets "all" and "check", causing
> > this standard recipe to fail:
> > 
> > 	./configure && make all check install
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Since in future releases the ELisp manual will be distributed as part
> of Emacs, I'm not sure this is something we need to fix.  What do you
> think?

I think it would probably not be the worst idea if the Elisp manual
remained available separately for those who desired it.  For example,
there might be XEmacs package authors around that would not mind
having their packages also run on Emacs.  If somebody else delivers a
first port, not much more than crosschecking with the Elisp manual
when doing changes is required, without having to install or use
Emacs itself.

Also there are many people using prepackaged versions of Emacs (RPM
files and the like).  If those want to, say, print out an Elisp
manual, they would need to get at the TeXinfo source.  The most
convenient way would be if it was available separately without having
to install one large source archive including the whole of Emacs.

That being said, I definitely applaud the inclusion of the Elisp
manual with Emacs.  This should have been done long ago.  One of
those changes that trigger "of course!" once somebody does them.

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
  2002-03-22 13:41   ` David Kastrup
@ 2002-03-22 14:29     ` Eli Zaretskii
  2002-03-23 16:14       ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Eli Zaretskii @ 2002-03-22 14:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: bug-gnu-emacs

> From: David Kastrup <David.Kastrup@t-online.de>
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
> Date: 22 Mar 2002 14:41:16 +0100
> 
> > Since in future releases the ELisp manual will be distributed as part
> > of Emacs, I'm not sure this is something we need to fix.  What do you
> > think?
> 
> I think it would probably not be the worst idea if the Elisp manual
> remained available separately for those who desired it.

I understand that it could be useful, but please don't forget that
each separate package requires some work to be done to release it.
With our resources severely limited, less important tasks don't get
done, unless someone volunteers.

> For example, there might be XEmacs package authors around that would
> not mind having their packages also run on Emacs.  If somebody else
> delivers a first port, not much more than crosschecking with the
> Elisp manual when doing changes is required, without having to
> install or use Emacs itself.

Anonymous CVS access should be a partial solution to that.

> Also there are many people using prepackaged versions of Emacs (RPM
> files and the like).  If those want to, say, print out an Elisp
> manual, they would need to get at the TeXinfo source.

Yes, that's a certain regression from the point of view of people who
want the printed copy.  Perhaps vendors who prepare the RPMs could be
requested to provide such packages?

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
  2002-03-22 14:29     ` Eli Zaretskii
@ 2002-03-23 16:14       ` Richard Stallman
  2002-03-23 18:19         ` David Kastrup
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2002-03-23 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: David.Kastrup, bug-gnu-emacs

    Yes, that's a certain regression from the point of view of people who
    want the printed copy.

People who want printed copies of the Emacs Lisp Manual can order them
from the Free Software Foundation and support our work.  Look in
www.gnu.org/order for more information.


_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
  2002-03-23 16:14       ` Richard Stallman
@ 2002-03-23 18:19         ` David Kastrup
  2002-03-25  0:19           ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: David Kastrup @ 2002-03-23 18:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: eliz, bug-gnu-emacs

Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

>     Yes, that's a certain regression from the point of view of people who
>     want the printed copy.
> 
> People who want printed copies of the Emacs Lisp Manual can order them
> from the Free Software Foundation and support our work.  Look in
> www.gnu.org/order for more information.

So you are a proponent of making free software and documentation hard
to use/access in order to provide a source of revenue?

-- 
David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
Email: David.Kastrup@t-online.de

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnu-emacs mailing list
Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnu-emacs


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

* Re: elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards
  2002-03-23 18:19         ` David Kastrup
@ 2002-03-25  0:19           ` Richard Stallman
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Richard Stallman @ 2002-03-25  0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  Cc: eliz, bug-gnu-emacs

    So you are a proponent of making free software and documentation hard
    to use/access in order to provide a source of revenue?

We are not making free software or documentation hard to use.  We
moved the Lisp manual into the Emacs distribution because users find
that more convenient.  It is easy enough to access from there.

It is very rude of you to accuse us of ill will just because you
dislike a change that we made.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-25  0:19 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-21 21:25 elisp-manual-21-2.8 Makefile does not conform to GNU standards Nelson H. F. Beebe
2002-03-22 13:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-22 13:41   ` David Kastrup
2002-03-22 14:29     ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-03-23 16:14       ` Richard Stallman
2002-03-23 18:19         ` David Kastrup
2002-03-25  0:19           ` Richard Stallman

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).