From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Roland Winkler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#1779: 23.0.60; proced with variable-pitch header line Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 06:56:01 -0500 Message-ID: <20006.49745.933829.299324@gargle.gargle.HOWL> References: <873afzcwdi.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <877hfnajcm.fsf@escher.home> <871v5tsw5q.fsf@escher.home> <8739i72r0o.fsf@escher.fritz.box> <87r55motf9.fsf@escher.fritz.box> <87ipqxg377.fsf@niu.edu> <87vcuxjqz7.fsf@escher.fritz.box> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1311168712 10845 80.91.229.12 (20 Jul 2011 13:31:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 1779@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stephen Berman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 20 15:31:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjWsL-00067x-Lq for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 15:31:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48580 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjWsJ-00081H-Pd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 09:31:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56676) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjVOj-000098-6C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjVOh-00028t-Md for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:57:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60579) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QjVOh-00028i-9v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:57:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjVOf-0001tQ-V3; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:57:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Roland Winkler" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:57:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 1779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: fixed Original-Received: via spool by 1779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B1779.13111629847227 (code B ref 1779); Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:57:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 1779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jul 2011 11:56:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjVO2-0001sV-N9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:56:23 -0400 Original-Received: from tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.164.197]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QjVO0-0001sI-Jw for 1779@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:56:21 -0400 Original-Received: from regnitz (unknown [218.22.26.51]) by tfkpsv.physik.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45BE528C30; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 13:56:11 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87vcuxjqz7.fsf@escher.fritz.box> X-Mailer: VM 8.2 trial under 24.0.50.1 (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 07:57:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:49472 Archived-At: On Wed Jul 20 2011 Stephen Berman wrote: > Certainly the new behavior is untenable; please revert my patch. I > didn't know about the long format and didn't test it. I took a quick > look but couldn't come up with a quick fix. I'll try some more when I > have time, but it won't be soon; if you or somebody else can find a fix, > that would be great. Or maybe this problem is a good argument for > hardcoding fixed-pitch for the proced header line. Right now it's not clear to me where things went wrong with your patch. The behavior I got did not make sense to me under any circumstances. So possibly this really indicated that things are going wrong elsewhere. I want to take a closer look at this, too. I am sorry I missed your original bug report. Roland