From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20332: 24.5; With jpeg-6b configure says "WARNING: libjpeg found, but not version 6b or later" Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:36:43 -0400 Message-ID: <1foamppfn8.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <552E58B1.6030600@redhat.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1429112244 16080 80.91.229.3 (15 Apr 2015 15:37:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:37:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: okshirai@gmail.com, 20332@debbugs.gnu.org To: Petr Hracek Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 15 17:37:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPNF-0004Q1-E5 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 17:37:09 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60987 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPNE-0002tn-Nc for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:37:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45063) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPNA-0002t2-E4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:37:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPN9-0006PZ-Dm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:37:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39228) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPN9-0006PU-AL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:37:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPN8-0006xa-JI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:37:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:37:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20332 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20332-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20332.142911220726728 (code B ref 20332); Wed, 15 Apr 2015 15:37:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20332) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Apr 2015 15:36:47 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57237 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPMs-0006x1-W4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:36:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:37144 ident=Debian-exim) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPMq-0006wt-SC for 20332@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:36:45 -0400 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YiPMp-0002ka-LT; Wed, 15 Apr 2015 11:36:43 -0400 X-Spook: national information infrastructure Waco, Texas PLO ASO X-Ran: r>v?X2X*,>u?&B~3R~h_yd-[(sW3cOaU4^s>1AqVtv^+_&>V2MSso"3[%U]&<^f+J}Db)u X-Hue: cyan X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <552E58B1.6030600@redhat.com> (Petr Hracek's message of "Wed, 15 Apr 2015 14:25:21 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:101556 Archived-At: Petr Hracek wrote: > I guess that it was already solved in bug 20124. No, I guess this problem was in fact caused by the change made for 20124.