From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39452: [PATCH] vc-git-state fails for filenames with wildcards Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 04:05:15 +0300 Message-ID: <1cb67253-c43f-caac-ee83-1241edaaeeaa@yandex.ru> References: <83h802g77h.fsf@gnu.org> <8f427281-510c-30c3-995f-364e22d9c1e2@yandex.ru> <85y2texxso.fsf@gmail.com> <52f47a82-b93e-d9c2-ee94-752b289d4b96@yandex.ru> <85lfp7ygk3.fsf@gmail.com> <87pmxwgcps.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23328"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.8.1 Cc: 39452@debbugs.gnu.org, Wolfgang.Scherer@gmx.de To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Noam Postavsky Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 17 03:06:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1liRi1-0005xW-BO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 17 May 2021 03:06:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45160 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liRi0-0000rG-Bd for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:36036) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liRhq-0000r8-Pq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40148) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1liRhq-0001eZ-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:06:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liRhq-0006Lm-CH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 01:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39452 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39452-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39452.162121352524366 (code B ref 39452); Mon, 17 May 2021 01:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39452) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 May 2021 01:05:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51694 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liRhF-0006Kw-As for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:05:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f45.google.com ([209.85.221.45]:34568) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1liRhD-0006Kj-NR for 39452@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 16 May 2021 21:05:24 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f45.google.com with SMTP id r12so4653754wrp.1 for <39452@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 16 May 2021 18:05:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XlvOlBmbiR1A4nT8KpTzThQ7YDSdGBu9HmtOTVi0Ynk=; b=CfEXFeovDvisiLNW5yfwsx6K8nKV0fApozmD8DhDYair14p92IRIZVRell0XXm8QmV 6bpv2LrTc4M6Wx6bpxPIYSkswijsFTXzrlS7J2r3gbM8qHlpaq7q0ubKseonGz1hbFzc Q89/Ojdp+yRztihAzDAlFbCi9sbMotP0LVeRAhPRI6cuPLjF57ld3Qv224H7MB8BMlPp nk8+2cQwaqWs2axju0aUyCBvxffonv62VvZguExiF6z1NeqfUthCVQl1PJwJtEwnPqpe xsj+gYzCqVU14hVRH1/Cn+0O0QHlRwbBIhTpfku8YvS8UKkeECvatBxCQEuPW+fnr/rQ oyLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=XlvOlBmbiR1A4nT8KpTzThQ7YDSdGBu9HmtOTVi0Ynk=; b=ZqaFRPEoFRLd6GQz87GqfEbALj+7c9wHZc59vZ8pRXHoeO2h8rUBCag6en3OfsKy7j KWl2/P4d0QW6UiOxN7EWq7kun3wVULOVZrx4BSFE3mjcH4q2QVEDuboc3HOoovo90mI/ im42vTzCqQvzCDBMJnIfO+yM9lIZptgqKWIygm6OQDcDdWVUMBi/xvEqH1br3VpbjpbK QqDYHW8JBQMWdxLixlHht2ybqPx8bOV4ld8q4EKN8gOh0cdJxsYIjAZ/NMMa+xedFtoi 3LC3w81r5a9sWfsJIgEBdlvRB9xJSRmbmkLPyFXzCr8xUCnxsy6VKgZPLo6wVeE9MuRY T4Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531ffVBgl86KOQaZnYRlQqsVT/xJplnj0l4sPj/OU6MwNfqI1dGO v4yWjSINlJazLWtwAxpBfDo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw44pnbx4zzH6mSLamHp2BUPmikox4KVwepGS/iI/e5b9GrcOJHpfcBbHJOUytMpgkj38FFkw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:1ac7:: with SMTP id i7mr72111909wry.380.1621213518009; Sun, 16 May 2021 18:05:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id y14sm15244722wrr.82.2021.05.16.18.05.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 16 May 2021 18:05:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87pmxwgcps.fsf@gnus.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:206694 Archived-At: On 12.05.2021 19:04, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Wolfgang's patch is larger, but doesn't have these drawbacks (if I > understand things correctly) -- so wouldn't it make sense to apply > Wolfgang's patch here? It's a pretty big fix for a straightforward (if fundamental) problem. The existence of the FAQ entry personally just tells me that the other approach has been proven in the field (by Magit), and if a FAQ entry is enough, the side-effects are probably not that common or serious. Because users, in general, don't read documentation. But other opinions welcome.