From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19479: Copyright issue Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:32:06 -0500 Message-ID: <1abnm7zoe1.fsf__10256.3151311644$1420835597$gmane$org@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <0etwzzu2gd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1420835597 22859 80.91.229.3 (9 Jan 2015 20:33:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 20:33:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, 19479@debbugs.gnu.org, assign@gnu.org To: Kelly Dean Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 09 21:33:10 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gF1-0002V9-QZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 21:33:07 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52139 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gF1-0000lc-9d for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:33:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52134) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gEx-0000lK-Fc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:33:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gEw-0006Lx-Nv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:60020) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gEw-0006Lt-La for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:33:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gEw-0003PF-Cm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:33:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:33:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19479 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: security Original-Received: via spool by 19479-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19479.142083553013026 (code B ref 19479); Fri, 09 Jan 2015 20:33:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19479) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jan 2015 20:32:10 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41153 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gE6-0003O2-9S for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:32:10 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:58044) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gE5-0003Nv-KD for 19479@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:32:09 -0500 Original-Received: from rgm by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y9gE2-0004C5-PC; Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:32:07 -0500 X-Spook: assassinate enemy of the state SAFE White House sniper X-Ran: r70-!0YsA&n7;>'_y)gDQQQ.my&+@B/?x3\I,;AO[m[#ABFW)"AsE+Wu&s\\:L_"nNN]RZ X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: <0etwzzu2gd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (Glenn Morris's message of "Fri, 09 Jan 2015 15:24:50 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98142 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > I must say, that it was not my impression that disclaimers were not > accaptable for Emacs. Only that the FSF does not offer a "past and > future" option for disclaimers like it does for assignments, so a new > disclaimer would have to be completed for every new change. I thought > this was not worth bothering with, so I advised you not to send more patches. PS but yes, for a non-trivial security issue like 19479 it did seem worth it to me, so I was on the verge of saying, would you be willing to complete a disclaimer for this change. But then Stefan said disclaimers were not viable, so I didn't bother to say it.