From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Yuan Fu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66152: 30.0.50; Missing indent rules in c-ts-mode Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:07:30 -0800 Message-ID: <1E6C674F-E848-46A9-BD58-9396E872940B@gmail.com> References: <1bb29ad2-270d-4b19-8d5f-90f23b9fd100@mailo.com> <83edih1m9i.fsf@gnu.org> <83lech4jz6.fsf@gnu.org> <83edeomlp0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.700.6\)) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26556"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: btuin@mailo.com, 66152@debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Kangas To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 13 08:08:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY81-0006iO-M4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 08:08:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY7n-0003sE-A4; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 02:08:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY7g-0003rj-K5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 02:08:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY7g-0005GB-BU for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 02:08:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY7e-0002hx-Fy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 02:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Yuan Fu Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2024 07:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66152 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 66152-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66152.170512967110393 (code B ref 66152); Sat, 13 Jan 2024 07:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66152) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Jan 2024 07:07:51 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38240 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY7T-0002hY-58 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 02:07:51 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]:54725) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rOY7O-0002hH-MP for 66152@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Jan 2024 02:07:50 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1d4a980fdedso64723505ad.1 for <66152@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:07:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1705129662; x=1705734462; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=DyCwavZX8LxT6RHKRmaEo6ikg+tTsbySlNYg/uyNLEI=; b=KO4cKmO2esikTNe+c/xnko1wTVH+tuF3IaF9t6NaTz5Apr5bzY3NWf9S9RehF1+awa ck1XU3nLbM+u11hdQLTHsfK1ENq6qtXzi9ikWogk1T8xA59B3k+QpWV3qnfEjSEUmouW tm1NezO0hd9nrWOGn21e6TgsP/jU1bnHoSTLTS+A4uBXKkej0MM6VLEqLS4sqYFhHoIK mP6bdYfBPZrkaXoR7akF+MFJ1AjOKcdF3lXcc3HjzSe7yK6OLNpNOUQ4cPA10ORme3nO FFI2vmrp0EJcjoAxXlPDZn/r98kSLtAQ0zj87XBhyW3AVjx1hEfQOAf5oAbWQA/D7DpT mb/A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705129662; x=1705734462; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=DyCwavZX8LxT6RHKRmaEo6ikg+tTsbySlNYg/uyNLEI=; b=DidDiO0xEAW8aVw/05bq0HH0rK9snQE+K7rv0S9aXWz+7Oh9LYCGJQUDleYUJ7qgS3 aQQmrq6/H0QYaqMZodqCbl7mh6rDrWX8vaAx7RQJNAZGlCYn0MYybQl6B8tasUzuEGzj rr5EM9b0ekr1gVX++0qVlIbLcJhdmWdneGMGYbWGvqXUys93ZH1pjSG5tK24wHAAL5bX fvS1CsRenUZfjX7NgOd/97TxJhEbk6TUJHopukWB4ciNsC0xOEzgVJ/86UKsFg1WTXe3 nQnScDO9nldw8+AtAQnsei5pe53U+8oGMEMCwYvCwZGK4F+GpzN0H78S8VuVehy3nPg9 OrHQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzkL6nztHur/Rb21nB5ON3oXbOqzDPqMvigzmZSWG/p2RL/IkcV Fj+RqytCL8LqSyEU9KWrKXU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEliWXQ444Szgl8vlM3vkNhR5vu5hx+ArRylAJxX/bQKcReVLymE+7QG45JPNPHcHBz58R9ZQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:e844:b0:1d4:d0e8:f9c8 with SMTP id t4-20020a170902e84400b001d4d0e8f9c8mr2964227plg.37.1705129662057; Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:07:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from smtpclient.apple (172-117-161-177.res.spectrum.com. [172.117.161.177]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r9-20020a170903014900b001d3e5271459sm4298346plc.55.2024.01.12.23.07.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 12 Jan 2024 23:07:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83edeomlp0.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.700.6) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:278092 Archived-At: > On Jan 10, 2024, at 10:24 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >=20 >> From: Stefan Kangas >> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:31:37 -0800 >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , btuin@mailo.com, = 66152@debbugs.gnu.org >>=20 >> Yuan Fu writes: >>=20 >>> LGTM, I applied the first patch to emacs-29. >>=20 >> What about patch 2 and 3? Should they be installed on master? >=20 > Not sure. It sounded like they were experimental, and no consensus > was reached. I had a look again, the first patch is applied, the second patch is = fixed in another report, the third patch is still in discussion. = Augustin said he=E2=80=99ll clean it up and extend it to apply to other = modes if it=E2=80=99s desirable. I think it=E2=80=99s good to have, we = just need to make sure it doesn=E2=80=99t bring any regression. Also I = don=E2=80=99t know how widely used is this kind of comments and how = important it is. Yuan=