From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#4710: 23.1.50; Bad display of underlines crossing line boundaries Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:04:24 -0700 Message-ID: <1B9BFFB859B3455EB5BAA63B186D853C@us.oracle.com> References: <4E75B5FE.1030208@dogan.se><4515BD8DE6284A249A67403FC1292685@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1316527513 20135 80.91.229.12 (20 Sep 2011 14:05:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 4710@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen'" , "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 20 16:05:05 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R60wb-0007LW-4J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:05:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52345 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60wa-0006Ji-JN for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:05:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34458) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60wW-0006J1-Qc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:05:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60wS-00057y-EX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:05:00 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:46959) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1R60wS-00057u-Bm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:04:56 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R611P-0003PM-56 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:10:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:10:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 4710 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 4710-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B4710.131652779313081 (code B ref 4710); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:10:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 4710) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Sep 2011 14:09:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R611E-0003Ow-J4 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:09:52 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet15.oracle.com ([141.146.126.227]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1R6119-0003Om-JQ for 4710@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:09:48 -0400 Original-Received: from rtcsinet22.oracle.com (rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30]) by acsinet15.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.4/Switch-3.4.4) with ESMTP id p8KE4aFC009637 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:04:39 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt358.oracle.com (acsmt358.oracle.com [141.146.40.158]) by rtcsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p8KE4Y37002386 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Sep 2011 14:04:35 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by acsmt358.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p8KE4Rhm030978; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 09:04:28 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.34.188) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:04:27 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: Acx3egpVyeQkjdc5SDOIS2RiPgSVtwAIYoDQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 X-Source-IP: rtcsinet22.oracle.com [66.248.204.30] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4E789D77.00C8,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 10:10:03 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 1) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:51535 Archived-At: > >> Why assume that underlined whitespace should not show an underline? > >> Likewise for other face attributes. > > > > I believe you're confused: I'm talking about line-wrapping > > done by the redisplay engine. I.e. there's no newline in > > the above example (but there are curly arrows in the fringe > > instead). > > I was talking about things that do have newlines in them. :-) > If you have the following text, where some of it underscores. > Like this:... and then you get this ugly-looking result. That was what I thought the bug report and discussion were about. Thanks for clarifying. And checking the original report and its linked pages (e.g., https://bugs.launchpad.net/nxhtml/+bug/449837), I still have that impression: "After using tidy if an underlined html/CSS items is immediately followed by a line break/return the underline continues across the page & goes on to the next line to finish @ the next block of text." "Followed by a line break/return" seems pretty clear to me. So maybe Stefan wants to file a separate bug for the soft-return/line-wrapping case he's really interested in. ;-)