From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "WAROQUIERS Philippe" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: RE: hp-ux 11.11 lib-src/Makefile cp fails due to identical files Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:06:23 +0200 Message-ID: <1B2B2EF98D55CB41BD16F13B18B9B0080303EE57@FFBRUE001.cfmu.corp.eurocontrol.int> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186758412 12890 80.91.229.12 (10 Aug 2007 15:06:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 15:06:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org To: "Eli Zaretskii" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 10 17:06:49 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IJW4e-0005nQ-Jh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:06:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJW4d-0001SV-Of for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:06:47 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJW4b-0001SQ-Go for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IJW4Z-0001Rw-Uo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:06:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IJW4Z-0001Rn-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:06:43 -0400 Original-Received: from exprod8og51.obsmtp.com ([64.18.3.84]) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IJW4Y-00006S-3Y; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:06:42 -0400 Original-Received: from source ([193.221.170.179]) by exprod8ob51.obsmtp.com ([64.18.7.12]) with SMTP; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 08:06:27 PDT Original-Received: from HHBRUE011.hq.corp.eurocontrol.int (hhbrue011.hq.corp.eurocontrol.int [193.221.161.80]) by biscuit.eurocontrol.int (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id l7AF6N5n012863; Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:06:23 +0200 (MEST) Original-Received: from FFBRUE001.cfmu.corp.eurocontrol.int ([193.58.25.51]) by HHBRUE011.hq.corp.eurocontrol.int with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:06:23 +0200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: hp-ux 11.11 lib-src/Makefile cp fails due to identical files Thread-Index: AcfbXW5uYVILAXLLTDGwP/lJTlaYugAAmiMg X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Aug 2007 15:06:23.0258 (UTC) FILETIME=[03ED5FA0:01C7DB60] X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:16316 Archived-At: >Does it help to prepend "-" to the offending command, i.e. > > rcs2log: $(srcdir)/rcs2log > -cp -p $(srcdir)/rcs2log rcs2log When I put the -, then the command still fails, but the make output tells the exit code 1 is ignored (which is the expected result of the -). Of course, it stops then on the next cp command with similar problem (e.g. vcdiff and others have the same problem). Thanks ____ This message and any files transmitted with it are legally privileged and= intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or entity to whom they ar= e addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sen= der by reply and delete the message and any attachments from your system.= Any unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message is str= ictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitme= nt on the part of EUROCONTROL, unless it is confirmed by appropriately si= gned hard copy. Any views expressed in this message are those of the sender. =0D