From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8944: 23.3; Formatting of Labeled Constructs in Fortran Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:24:11 -0400 Message-ID: <19978.18043.878536.411684@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87sjqvdqmt.fsf@mon.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <4E095C50.9090101@mathalacarte.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309296334 21939 80.91.229.12 (28 Jun 2011 21:25:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8944@debbugs.gnu.org To: Fred Krogh Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jun 28 23:25:30 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbfmi-0006zm-SU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:25:29 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58207 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbfmh-0007zj-AR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:27 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbfmK-0007xw-A0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbfmI-0007NU-TL for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37664) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbfmI-0007NP-K7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbfmH-0002Db-VW; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Glenn Morris Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:25:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8944 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8944-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8944.13092962618467 (code B ref 8944); Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:25:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8944) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Jun 2011 21:24:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbfld-0002CU-6C for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:24:21 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbfla-0002CH-14 for 8944@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:24:18 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33940) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbflU-0003JU-6T; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:24:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4E095C50.9090101@mathalacarte.com> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 17:25:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47559 Archived-At: (Please keep the debbugs address included in replies). Fred Krogh wrote (on Mon, 27 Jun 2011 at 21:45 -0700): > > I don't understand what you are asking for, because the names > > already make no difference to the indentation of subsequent lines. [...] > I must apologize. I swear that this sort of thing was not working for > me in the past. I just tried your example and then a slightly more > complicated example and it seems to work. OK, good, that was easy! > > I'm not going to implement this. It is too difficult to support > > constructs split across lines. > I'm sorry to belabor this. Not knowing how this sort of think might > actually be implemented it seems to me easy to ignore the indentation of > a construct name. Of course I really don't understand how this sort of > thing gets handled and I am very grateful to have what I have. The reason it makes life more difficult is that if everything is on one line, you can basically just do everything with a simple regular expression; but if things are allowed to be split over lines then you need to do a more complicating parsing. Anyway, I'll leave this bug report open but will mark it as "wontfix".