* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
@ 2008-12-13 22:30 Drew Adams
2008-12-13 22:50 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2008-12-13 22:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-pretest-bug
I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just
after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit
from that input.
Please take the suggestions in that message into consideration. I
filed the bug, and I still think there's room for improvement.
In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
of 2008-11-24 on LENNART-69DE564
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include
-fno-crossjumping'
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
2008-12-13 22:30 bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Drew Adams
@ 2008-12-13 22:50 ` Glenn Morris
2008-12-13 23:08 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2008-12-13 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 1566
merge 1566 1352
stop
Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 14:30 -0800):
> I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just
> after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit
> from that input.
Information sent after a bug is closed still gets added to the bug report.
Only after 28 days of no activity, the bug is archived. At that point,
you cannot directly add more information to it.
Your input was received.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
2008-12-13 22:50 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2008-12-13 23:08 ` Drew Adams
2008-12-13 23:10 ` Glenn Morris
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2008-12-13 23:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Glenn Morris', 1566
> > I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just
> > after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit
> > from that input.
>
> Information sent after a bug is closed still gets added to
> the bug report.
> Only after 28 days of no activity, the bug is archived. At that point,
> you cannot directly add more information to it.
>
> Your input was received.
I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My impression is
that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it was received. I think he did
not have the benefit of that input. I'm asking that the additional input be
considered, even though the bug was closed before it came in.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
2008-12-13 23:08 ` Drew Adams
@ 2008-12-13 23:10 ` Glenn Morris
2008-12-13 23:42 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Glenn Morris @ 2008-12-13 23:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 1566
Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 15:08 -0800):
> I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
> impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
> was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm
> asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug
> was closed before it came in.
I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
2008-12-13 23:10 ` Glenn Morris
@ 2008-12-13 23:42 ` Drew Adams
2008-12-19 0:45 ` Juri Linkov
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2008-12-13 23:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Glenn Morris', 1566
> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm
> > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug
> > was closed before it came in.
>
> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.
Clever. ;-)
You're sure, but I'm not.
Now Juri is at least aware of the input.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
2008-12-13 23:42 ` Drew Adams
@ 2008-12-19 0:45 ` Juri Linkov
2008-12-19 6:14 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Juri Linkov @ 2008-12-19 0:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Drew Adams; +Cc: 1566
>> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
>> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
>> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm
>> > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug
>> > was closed before it came in.
>>
>> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.
>
> Clever. ;-)
>
> You're sure, but I'm not.
> Now Juri is at least aware of the input.
I don't know is it possible to reply to #1352. There is some spam at
the end of http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352
--
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
2008-12-19 0:45 ` Juri Linkov
@ 2008-12-19 6:14 ` Drew Adams
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Drew Adams @ 2008-12-19 6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Juri Linkov'; +Cc: 1566
Hi Juri,
> >> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
> >> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
> >> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of
> >> > that input. I'm asking that the additional input be considered,
> >> > even though the bug was closed before it came in.
> >>
> >> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.
> >
> > Clever. ;-)
> >
> > You're sure, but I'm not.
> > Now Juri is at least aware of the input.
>
> I don't know is it possible to reply to #1352. There is some spam at
> the end of
> http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352
Hm; so there is - dunno what that's about.
Anyway, the input I was hoping you'd take a look at and think about is in the
bug report, as Message #50:
http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352#50
No need to reply, unless you have a question about what I meant. Do whatever you
think is best.
Thx - Drew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-12-19 6:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-12-13 22:30 bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input Drew Adams
2008-12-13 22:50 ` Glenn Morris
2008-12-13 23:08 ` Drew Adams
2008-12-13 23:10 ` Glenn Morris
2008-12-13 23:42 ` Drew Adams
2008-12-19 0:45 ` Juri Linkov
2008-12-19 6:14 ` Drew Adams
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).