From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Drew Adams" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8865: 24.0.50; `display-buffer' does not respect `pop-up-frames' Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:02:00 -0700 Message-ID: <185D134A9D484823B6473FD6B358D248@us.oracle.com> References: <4DF7B1BB.6050704@gmx.at><4DF87A4F.60704@gmx.at><5F95025D0ABE4561A305F30293828F38@us.oracle.com><4DF8DD1E.8080004@gmx.at><68E985ED37824BE799A9C01162553E22@us.oracle.com><4DF8EF87.8080903@gmx.at><7923A876A42744A39EEC6AAB67362EAC@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308236979 31046 80.91.229.12 (16 Jun 2011 15:09:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:09:39 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8865@debbugs.gnu.org To: "'Stefan Monnier'" Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jun 16 17:09:35 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXECN-0001Ug-Fi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:09:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32795 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXECL-00051f-F8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:38999) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXDA7-0004m7-7i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:03:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXDA0-0004T1-2M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:38989) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXD9z-0004Sa-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:03:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXD9y-00028L-Jd; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Drew Adams" Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8865 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8865-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8865.13082329428150 (code B ref 8865); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8865) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jun 2011 14:02:22 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXD9J-00027P-Qm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:02:22 -0400 Original-Received: from rcsinet10.oracle.com ([148.87.113.121]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXD9H-000273-QT for 8865@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:02:20 -0400 Original-Received: from acsinet22.oracle.com (acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238]) by rcsinet10.oracle.com (Switch-3.4.2/Switch-3.4.2) with ESMTP id p5GE2Cn1003474 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:02:14 GMT Original-Received: from acsmt356.oracle.com (acsmt356.oracle.com [141.146.40.156]) by acsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p5GE2B8J008255 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Jun 2011 14:02:11 GMT Original-Received: from abhmt010.oracle.com (abhmt010.oracle.com [141.146.116.19]) by acsmt356.oracle.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id p5GE251U002836; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 09:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from dradamslap1 (/10.159.51.17) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:02:05 -0700 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcwsJxVS2X7lmGGeS9eNpj0D7H6M5QAAtoOQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 X-Source-IP: acsinet22.oracle.com [141.146.126.238] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090203.4DFA0CE6.0082:SCFMA922111,ss=1,fgs=0 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:03:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47239 Archived-At: > > BTW, can you tell me what is a reasonable substitute for tests of > > `pop-up-frames' now? That is, what to do about code that has (if > > pop-up-frames ...)? What is the replacement for such a > > test in Emacs 24? Thx. > > Depends on the intention behind that test, I guess. The intention of that test has to be to determine whether `pop-up-frames' is nil or non-nil, since that was the original design of `pop-up-frames'. Non-nil was designed to mean that `display-buffer' uses another frame. From the Emacs 20-23 doc string (and probably ever since the variable existed - probably Emacs 18): "Non-nil means `display-buffer' should make a separate frame." Emacs 23 added a particular non-nil value, `graphic-only', but the simple nil/non-nil test behavior is what I'm after and is what the Emacs source code has used as well - it's generally graphic displays that my code is concerned with wrt frames. See my reply to Martin for examples, if that helps.