Re: nesting of unwind-protect and atomic-change-group

["Roland Winkler" <Roland.Winkler@physik.uni-erlangen.de>]

On Sat Feb 2 2008 Richard Stallman wrote:
>     When combining unwind-protect and atomic-change-group I found that
>     putting unwind-protect outermost worked for me (i.e., an unwindform
>     moving point to the buffer location where the error occured was
>     obeyed), whereas doing it the other way round didn't work for me
>     (the unwindform was ignored). 
> 
> An unwind-protect will _work_ either inside or outside
> of atomic-change-group.  Whatever problem you encountered
> must be more specific.  I can't guess what it might be.

Thanks for clarifying this. My real-world example based on
bibtex-entry-format is too complicated as a test case. I'll boil it
down to something more amenable.

Roland