From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Olivier Certner Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs,gmane.emacs.erc.general Subject: bug#44100: Patch Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:38:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1779714.fmOJIAR8ZY@ravel> References: <4578382.cRamKGfW39@ravel> <87mu01cjfh.fsf@gnus.org> <87lffjf9lu.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8559"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-erc@gnu.org, 44100@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Amin Bandali Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 05 17:39:11 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiI2-00029W-Qr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 17:39:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56606 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiI1-0005qP-Tb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:39:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46192) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiHv-0005pq-0i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:39:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:42421) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiHu-0008PA-NC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:39:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiHu-0008CY-L0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:39:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Olivier Certner Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2020 16:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44100 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, emacs-erc@gnu.org, 44100@debbugs.gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by 44100-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44100.160459430531455 (code B ref 44100); Thu, 05 Nov 2020 16:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44100) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Nov 2020 16:38:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53962 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiHI-0008BG-Pd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:38:24 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp4-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.4]:44520) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kaiHG-0008B8-SH for 44100@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2020 11:38:23 -0500 Original-Received: from ravel.localnet (unknown [90.116.215.212]) (Authenticated sender: ocert.dev@free.fr) by smtp4-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4687019F61D; Thu, 5 Nov 2020 17:38:12 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87lffjf9lu.fsf@gnu.org> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:192739 gmane.emacs.erc.general:1494 Archived-At: Hello Amin, Sorry for the late reply, I missed these mails in a flood of other mails. And sorry as well for the ChangeLog entry, I had read CONTRIBUTE, but mixed things up (there is a section explaining how to generate change log entries in Emacs afterwards, and I forgot the earlier advice). > [...] > > I welcome anyone who would like to volunteer to send a patch for > updating those functions to work with a normalized list of lists for > those two variables, granted they can provide a convincing argument that > their change is correct and does not break the current behaviour, does > not dramatically further increase the complexity of the algorithms, and > is ideally backward compatible with the current non-normalized structure > of those two variables as well. I'll have a look at this next week. Thanks and regards. -- Olivier Certner