From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: aidalgol@amuri.net Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#18438: 24.4.50; assertion failed in bidi.c Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 15:58:08 +1300 Message-ID: <1701b4d70687a663edf0ee1d665dac91@amuri.net> References: <4745242cd3e424a6c4d5db0e8d3e33d0@amuri.net> <83h9zrlzc8.fsf@gnu.org> <54297FDB.6090606@cornell.edu> <837g0mmkf3.fsf@gnu.org> <6b19fab333f3d362ae61b30b299d7206@amuri.net> <83iok5ku74.fsf@gnu.org> <542AD5BC.2060408@cornell.edu> <83a95hkr9i.fsf@gnu.org> <8ecb4bc5619fb821d12f5ec7bab30b19@amuri.net> <83wq8kjyx2.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412132359 29934 80.91.229.3 (1 Oct 2014 02:59:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2014 02:59:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 18438@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 01 04:59:13 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA8H-0002Hk-Lz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 Oct 2014 04:59:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA8H-00019L-Aw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:59:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA8A-00019F-Sj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:59:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA86-0003Hb-PB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:59:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:37000) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA86-0003HV-Lg for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:59:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA86-0008CZ-0z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:59:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: aidalgol@amuri.net Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 02:59:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 18438 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 18438-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B18438.141213228931457 (code B ref 18438); Wed, 01 Oct 2014 02:59:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 18438) by debbugs.gnu.org; 1 Oct 2014 02:58:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56797 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA7F-0008BJ-Be for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:58:09 -0400 Original-Received: from goat.amuri.net ([203.99.132.195]:56314) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XZA7B-0008B8-FX for 18438@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 30 Sep 2014 22:58:07 -0400 Original-Received: from webmail.amuri.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by goat.amuri.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2102FFA62; Wed, 1 Oct 2014 15:58:08 +1300 (NZDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=amuri.net; s=mail1; t=1412132289; bh=OTVbAmlQWhto9Nm4UbVK/tBSRaqXD/zCtCIIpfiL1CQ=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID; b=LODbnVUrOxmZQCXyFhUl21697pYqExWnZGoK+soZVj220WqrXW8b5fBbsSPGJjIf6 qEnGGG+N+dBiWeP+lg1lwSMbKZzu0145toFpvmNotoi/SlbGqclQb60KVaBXdR3mbl Ygf4cvqL3BZNHCWqfHD2/NBbYc0wsi1qzl4KiRzw= In-Reply-To: <83wq8kjyx2.fsf@gnu.org> X-Sender: aidalgol@amuri.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.5.3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:93951 Archived-At: On Wed, 01 Oct 2014 05:39:53 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 12:06:06 +1300 >> From: aidalgol@amuri.net >> Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Ken Brown >> >> On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 19:27:37 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2014 12:09:32 -0400 >> >> From: Ken Brown >> >> CC: 18438@debbugs.gnu.org >> >> >> >> Wouldn't it make sense for him to first see if your recent fix of >> >> the >> >> "Current trunk aborts with MinGW" problem also fixes the present >> >> bug? >> > >> > Could be, yes. I actually thought about this possibility, but >> didn't >> > mention it because I couldn't come up with a scenario where that >> bug >> > could have triggered such strange problems, and only in bidi.c. >> But >> > it does no harm to try applying that patch first, and only apply >> this >> > one if that doesn't help. >> >> And where is this patch? I don't keep up with the happenings on >> trunk. > > Sorry, it's here: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2014-09/msg00901.html When I try to apply that to commit 623a1b2, patch says "Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!" Has this been merged to the emacs-24 branch?