From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44834: Fix for failing indentation of Tcl procs nested in namespace Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 16:49:38 +0200 Message-ID: <1663d754-0684-c792-6e25-490ea4ef1f0d@yandex.ru> References: <87sg8zk4lj.fsf@precedence.co.uk> <87k0rzatbp.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mo85t6.fsf@gnus.org> <8735y7nk9z.fsf@gnus.org> <87h7mlk5re.fsf@gnus.org> <8335y5l059.fsf@gnu.org> <87k0rgeyju.fsf@gnus.org> <83sg62hdkc.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33462"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0 Cc: anticrisisg@gmail.com, larsi@gnus.org, 44834@debbugs.gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 11 15:50:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lADIJ-0008ar-Va for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 15:50:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34208 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lADII-0007IY-TR for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lADIA-0007I2-VN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46566) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lADIA-0005hP-Ob for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:50:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lADIA-0001QY-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:50:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44834 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 44834-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44834.16130549905459 (code B ref 44834); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 14:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44834) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Feb 2021 14:49:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58112 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lADHy-0001Pz-1d for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:49:50 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-f49.google.com ([209.85.128.49]:50288) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lADHv-0001Pm-Sg for 44834@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 09:49:48 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 190so5814781wmz.0 for <44834@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:49:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HGq2iHWWgrGQzfgrqUiQwXgIY+KLyDGO4xpP46JKZWE=; b=dxypC8aB61HrRWSMCP4+7ORDxxQMBTuggAS5e5uJTMQXTbl2r+dhB4HT+7XiAMYWO8 c9AKFJP2cYuDtepuf/loxnbpJPHNPGLMciUo1eHvJmuBYqUFZdtfe72SUk7+dO5JhB9d y70oZVewcdImPNFDOzBcGpcqJLvIY+x+b0Vq14jC9spnlusaHLXXGGUMO+ZitAOklUU1 dwZwlQ7WBVJjW7p8MuHxLq7je1rIQUPkHWLisToT7m6wCcmdzB2I/bepSyzg/uFy8YIP SLj2K16Ln/Pb02oixLHS6b3Mt5BHqoPd0u4xZAC0f5TwIkE2JVmDyaRla+rb5p7mQxRd tqkg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id :date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HGq2iHWWgrGQzfgrqUiQwXgIY+KLyDGO4xpP46JKZWE=; b=SPK/xTYFVRHBESnVP3pdKI/pJsgR+SvTZrXIkDbZ3IPnmleVPpJy/ixptZxnaPM3ax Gj8iddl+sNQ2TI97oNlHQuMeLwTsW6HsM1WVU1FVBs024LZsCR4S4OwiLbN/4v/xC6WO 3wBsEh2lLRDTUxhTADxhAWXd1OME0SDhhgYvJuUyHZcqocdxPK2dBwotKQ92FwM3TbGd hDHpuUtFcUIub9C1JTOjH+6K4dkfYeHClp2liYyfbmLhgfSAcggIMhUKAagQFQFWp27x sUKkStsGB1dmDBWgNBX0KFBGMvS16dF8jS2sP3aR0k6rBrSd5tjkwVd5VoT9Fb09m2W/ P8aA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531Pcr05Ap8pCYybtggwbKdZxPA6kaeT1ztktkaU899Bh/z9G8+x dxAgCU+gamj0fwqxzj9VwaPvutTPQ1Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPLIbpM2RmvHQSHF25YqeOs8SsDUuH86QxbO5jAiP5xbwkigGNzEJr+e/k38El/IiSAuZZHA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cb4f:: with SMTP id v15mr5607237wmj.162.1613054982154; Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:49:42 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id b15sm5338572wrr.47.2021.02.11.06.49.39 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 11 Feb 2021 06:49:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83sg62hdkc.fsf@gnu.org> Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:199817 Archived-At: On 11.02.2021 16:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > Empty lines are clearly trivial, but what other examples of trivial > lines exist? Should we say "non-empty lines"? I think we should also usually discount the cases of moving code around. If a line was removed in one place and an exact same line added in another, it's not really new code.