From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Dmitry Gutov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#53644: 29.0.50; xref-search-program breaks if programm not installed on a remote host Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 18:37:42 +0200 Message-ID: <14f32b2b-4c6c-cde5-0d54-85c677cac581@yandex.ru> References: <87v8y0rdz3.fsf@posteo.net> <87iltvnj3g.fsf@gmx.de> <3b4cfff4-4d95-9f8e-d5ec-db6cc492a9b8@yandex.ru> <87leypml9i.fsf@gmx.de> <01015f05-e40c-c18a-8b03-5012a3cb44ba@yandex.ru> <875ypp624b.fsf@posteo.net> <87iltptnem.fsf@gmx.de> <87k0e5uvtp.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6f1tdlt.fsf@gmx.de> <87bkzhrrd2.fsf@posteo.net> <875ypotqwj.fsf@gmx.de> <878ruk4cwo.fsf@posteo.net> <828ff352-8a6c-b768-a4cc-427f6fd955f7@yandex.ru> <87leydy2iz.fsf@posteo.net> <877d9xxsjd.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6esozui.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7880"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Cc: Michael Albinus , 53644@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philip Kaludercic Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Feb 15 17:42:37 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0uT-0001vP-Si for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 17:42:37 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53208 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0uS-0004V9-Q9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:42:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55068) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0q2-0000NZ-MA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:52390) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0q2-0003U4-Bz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:38:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0q2-0005no-9V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:38:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Dmitry Gutov Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:38:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 53644 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 53644-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B53644.164494307322284 (code B ref 53644); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 16:38:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 53644) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Feb 2022 16:37:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46287 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0ps-0005nM-Vg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:37:53 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-f46.google.com ([209.85.221.46]:34771) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nK0pr-0005n8-3Q for 53644@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 11:37:51 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-f46.google.com with SMTP id s10so19564902wrb.1 for <53644@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:37:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent:subject :content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qZLCPi1qM9736QrLDOHSYWZ7UJSth1NLh0DpW8afsP8=; b=dkFIZQNItVB7LM2ETwv88FuTqft9xGQwp4xh6IRD93viMrm8JkkSQUQ8lw1PwWb9Xe TMPcyvvXZAPag+esmKO3KY/R5hE8U9S2Vd5qadsrIeBNCNNypQZHPnB+gGhShTnm5Htr MOesn5oLGV47Kw8iOrop+TorU6VbDW2yKJZCRGgCUznavB2Id26nneadoQF24qhncmmk MYq1gQWTJXfSG1RvbRad3YJxVHWv+ccqIsNKmoLh9UwAyMSnUG50T+rcCojihu2ibWvP QsvB6QH2C6wIaFB1BM3rhsQMEtc+OcAu3ucImjgQC5mtwSC5KiS62941I4/0HXGfv7Pb 1IAw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:message-id:date:mime-version:user-agent :subject:content-language:to:cc:references:from:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qZLCPi1qM9736QrLDOHSYWZ7UJSth1NLh0DpW8afsP8=; b=LtEUZHat9SWEDNGVy5rp1aoVW6OZejWj/YFpZPKBFNc1qMJfYrvLyu45d5XivUVvwa aLFgcN7oMg3t0VqpVSuratOlaRnutdlGYL4CNi+Xr81viOHlA9Kf2RR6Gsfz5pPT5IcY QrrrcOg/OBd9KpuBAGaDsWz7gps9wFUdmw1Rm6aSQ0ErYlC7awoK/BpamkTZe6bla77d 7HaG0dvxYz9s4MgGCSsYh59UGr7tYWA509HdDo2i/G2oAzNI7FUKdupXJ80SiNkNnIux q/PHhq/Wsb4ZfL0m/BTxb7w2+iSd1XmUV+23v4p1grkNs6q7dzpBe17SXYtitRZD+mFs FPjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533eTmBiHQoVWPNbdxlibgYjQq5JUSaJGS180bbBtKdL5yexnW1Q 93da0YevbpdS4Iul4xY73DQ= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxfKLixmcD8NZFxyZ5tlFpmn9IbzSZIMwVzY9YwwMaXSLFTrDIsLbd58jORAB9i1DsB+tU+vQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:518f:: with SMTP id k15mr3943163wrv.249.1644943065206; Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:37:45 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.0.6] ([46.251.119.176]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id i11sm19190156wrx.103.2022.02.15.08.37.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 15 Feb 2022 08:37:44 -0800 (PST) Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <87a6esozui.fsf@posteo.net> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:226997 Archived-At: On 15.02.2022 18:32, Philip Kaludercic wrote: > I am biased, but I do prefer the current state of the patch. If you > think it would help, I could comment it out more? It's not like I don't understand what it's doing on every line of the code (roughly), more like it exceeds the max level of complexity I'd like to see in a function. Which is not a problem for us now, but is likely to become such for someone who comes later. It could slow down some future changes too, though. I'm obviously biased myself, so more opinions welcome.