From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Steve Kemp Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#27585: segfault when evaluating a file containing only backticks Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:26:53 +0000 Message-ID: <1499243213.32432.0@ssh.steve.org.uk> References: <1499235670.28433.1@ssh.steve.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1499243297 12989 195.159.176.226 (5 Jul 2017 08:28:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 08:28:17 +0000 (UTC) To: 27585@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jul 05 10:28:13 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSffL-0002yz-I7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 10:28:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44812 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSffR-0002PJ-0u for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:28:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38331) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSffJ-0002PD-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:28:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSffG-0002xn-B2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50249) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dSffG-0002xY-1p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:28:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSffF-0006bC-SP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:28:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Steve Kemp Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:28:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 27585 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 27585-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B27585.149924325125331 (code B ref 27585); Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:28:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 27585) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jul 2017 08:27:31 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52926 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSfel-0006aV-LT for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.steve.org.uk ([80.68.84.102]:33766 helo=ssh.steve.org.uk) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSfek-0006aI-Qk for 27585@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 04:27:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=steve.org.uk; s=20150726; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To; bh=MGSJ7r+pwFP568cM9cWz5/ndgRnQE/thN4IT2kwmqf8=; b=AFTkRk4sTRkmWcWhqGlL7842c8rQzPxcCiq+5IXudkYzcWQGspKAZm7mw6Jcy4nMPz0yI8eopraahUqcZ4+3mYuvOVyzW6PYwHgwchOVMo8/i1uYWiqm7z+l9FkH4U+9H75fa0d2ea/Z74iy547xC7dVPeyXE1C/rlcoeJ53YX4=; Original-Received: from steve by ssh.steve.org.uk with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dSfef-00007x-3M for 27585@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 05 Jul 2017 08:27:25 +0000 In-Reply-To: X-added-header: steve.org.uk X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:134200 Archived-At: > > #5 handle_sigsegv (sig=11, siginfo=, arg=) > > at sysdep.c:1811 > > #6 > > #7 read1 (readcharfun=readcharfun@entry=35581829, > > pch=pch@entry=0x7ffcc661e010, first_in_list=first_in_list@entry=false) > > at lread.c:2923 > > Most likely just a stack overflow. Agreed, but still I think a segfault is unexpected and could be prevented. Steve -- https://www.steve.org.uk/