From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13425: close this bug? Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:01:55 +0100 Message-ID: <1485698515.4344.0@smtp.gmail.com> References: <87efzqhh93.fsf@tromey.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1485698608 5992 195.159.176.226 (29 Jan 2017 14:03:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 14:03:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13425@debbugs.gnu.org To: Tom Tromey , Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 29 15:03:21 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq4V-0008RZ-3C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 15:03:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55497 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq4a-0006Of-By for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:03:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48696) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq4V-0006OP-2B for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq4R-0000ww-Sw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:03:11 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:51581) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq4R-0000wo-Q2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:03:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq4M-0001GN-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:03:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Simen =?UTF-8?Q?Heggest=C3=B8yl?= Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 14:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13425 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13425-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13425.14856985264780 (code B ref 13425); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 14:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13425) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jan 2017 14:02:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49780 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq3S-0001F2-3a for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:02:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lf0-f51.google.com ([209.85.215.51]:34956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cXq3Q-0001EZ-LJ for 13425@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 09:02:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lf0-f51.google.com with SMTP id n124so182508667lfd.2 for <13425@debbugs.gnu.org>; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 06:02:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:subject:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version; bh=HQGx+Hj+4IVKINLtmAJGJpiDSeZWAS1Q2STfkLrxknA=; b=osmhWTNLB3wu/OdIOqTHjstKSEWfw7vX6j9Ys8S1G/J3OPv1ICTBz/luJ+QvhyzYQg iiSAc0sdOpAaTWupadKsIvLpbp5J1ufJkJmZW1McgkS/ujywLJCpHXADxLLZlHHA5viQ MjA+xfPlQowZUzcyC1o3f57qtbvZYPm3nYOry9NxSEnpTGR3AFLp+1rot6znsF+W+Tjf fKghZAlfvc0fXLjfEbwMJ/cVI85YfoOCmN6/duBmfawqfAhQu6Cd6Y/tW2rD7KET5nLB AHQYpKi1FpSQSxWnIdP/Hze58+2jNyn0v0imrFapP8O5aO6kpZhXKLF9raKPJVNN3rRm siWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:subject:to:cc:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version; bh=HQGx+Hj+4IVKINLtmAJGJpiDSeZWAS1Q2STfkLrxknA=; b=euu3PuKIqj8m3BdPvUochpFYMgJLHxBhUHr5Km10V1RW/VfetBI4CH8SD248JvezVM KZEfQeTL3cbGW8VblHXnbDKG0CM2ZY57yLxe1YJBndp97YiU0WFtQqP1G9WCa7/AQQXH kHoG474kVoZZGv6k3y4mi0xitiPrHIdefRKDDCpoXLErRUH1TbaVzaTVPr2i8SrIdO+A c3RjVcjLMuMjr7FYNkr5ssV6h2QTTbQT06O6/248gr65D2Y+33yalCJ/f5AhuPUxIziB MPNF9EiHpkEBKpC9+rh0j5hH8znhqkkEAZQgoQ7KwEKufWf1JQpMSz8x9O0UAYuYK6NI cdRA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKMO3ZrVPyvzONOJGfvadvdZfJZQ0IMAxMr+Y3kNi3kVpV5yl8Xp8YQ9S7p4MTEVg== X-Received: by 10.25.199.9 with SMTP id x9mr4649804lff.95.1485698518332; Sun, 29 Jan 2017 06:01:58 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from [192.168.100.10] (cm-84.210.143.4.getinternet.no. [84.210.143.4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o91sm3012166lfg.17.2017.01.29.06.01.56 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sun, 29 Jan 2017 06:01:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87efzqhh93.fsf@tromey.com> X-Mailer: geary/0.11.3 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:128754 Archived-At: I agree that the SMIE-based indenter is good, and I'd like to keep it. The mentioned problem of aligning lines after a comma is indeed the only problem I've had with it. On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:06 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: > I did spend a bit of time trying to get it to line up continued > properties under the ":", like: > > font: 15px "Helvetica Neue", > Helvetica, > Arial, > "Nimbus Sans L", > sans-serif; > > ... but all I really accomplished was realizing that I don't > understand > SMIE. I did that too, but I had to reach the same conclusion... If we aren't able to fix this with problem the SMIE-based indenter, and Evgeni's indenter handles it better, I think we should consider it. But as said, I think it would be ideal to fix and keep the indenter we have. Stefan, do you have time to look into it, or do you have some pointers to how we could fix this problem with the SMIE-based indenter? -- Simen