From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rankin Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24193: 25.1; `window-min-size' fails for horizontal width when margins >= body text Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 20:02:23 +1000 Message-ID: <1471255343.1036269.695518577.5049CAE8@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1470734067.1046352.690034953.5B0A54FE@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57A9A714.4010600@gmx.at> <1470736919.1056423.690073473.51DB916F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <57A9AD24.6090303@gmx.at> <1470739033.1062589.690104169.1A130EC9@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83ziomgfcd.fsf@gnu.org> <1470755912.754355.690353977.4F305064@webmail.messagingengine.com> <83r39ygcr5.fsf@gnu.org> <1471151490.3505042.694683657.3D32B261@webmail.messagingengine.com> <831t1rh14o.fsf@gnu.org> <57B17D1C.7070200@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1471255409 14206 195.159.176.226 (15 Aug 2016 10:03:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:03:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 24193@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Aug 15 12:03:22 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEjp-0003MV-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 12:03:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35811 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEjm-0007K4-2s for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:03:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38411) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEjd-0007Ie-80 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:03:10 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEjZ-000654-8p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:03:09 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEjW-000645-Vt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:03:05 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEjW-0006B4-HG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:03:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Paul Rankin Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:03:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24193 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24193-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24193.147125534723693 (code B ref 24193); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:03:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24193) by debbugs.gnu.org; 15 Aug 2016 10:02:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57911 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEiw-0006A5-Px for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:02:26 -0400 Original-Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:56724) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bZEiv-00069x-4F for 24193@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:02:25 -0400 Original-Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7BD204F1; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:02:23 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:02:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=paulwrankin.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=aW6NmCo+a74SxIS9Hmtfld3Op9k =; b=WeeAGUG6pEFxTbbwR1u4Q5M6C/QNH0t1mdkfS5vQH2tekPRVmiHC1Lp3AnO AE5Iko7Msr9AqVcv+p98RtZJiCg8WXizQafP4Eu75tr8sJGk1mlfn7nWEiYvD/zN 0caFORPaa69kTWS2zqjYylstpHaOTdzhifDd/fg5KkTG35So= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=aW6NmCo+a74SxIS 9Hmtfld3Op9k=; b=bCHKPLtiTgA5hZRypdosIJHByI87WOI3TebZDDvx7/5DHh0 LXzLq6uyoFxZuyZwzsZC9McWfNFsNxdr9WKO3KasXLsTGMMY/rqSR/Vs+UwCalgW SMX8suLF8yGQMsehtPW9+lO6yqvFQnXBEo3T5Yw9wRb1MlREQGnN2mjB8G1k= Original-Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0D2DB6A63A; Mon, 15 Aug 2016 06:02:23 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-Enc: EpHd8GhdTysFVrJNRsMseUPv6O4+F+yPP6J2WaBHh7CF 1471255343 X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-71d1d584 In-Reply-To: <57B17D1C.7070200@gmx.at> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:122235 Archived-At: martin rudalics on Mon, 15 Aug 2016 10:28 +0200: > > I'm not sure we want to change window-min-size. That function is used > > for purposes that have nothing to do with splitting the window. E.g., > > we also use its value when deciding whether a window can be resized, > > when fitting window to buffer, etc. > > > > The lowest level function for splitting windows is split-window, so > > the change should IMO be either in split-window-right or in > > split-window. Martin, WDYT? > > This wouldnn't help much because as soon as a user has two side-by-side > windows she might want to drag the divider between those windows and > complain that it doesn't move. We can install the attached hack in > Emacs 25.1 and leave this subject alone until someone has a better > solution. Ah brilliant! Thank you Martin :) If/when this is replaced, would this bug thread to be referenced? It would certainly help with updating the modes affected. I guess etiquette would dictate that a mode should set these to the maximum of the existing value or its own for cases when two modes want control of minimum margin width.... is that a case that can arise? I guess it is.....