From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: canoeberry Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15946: 24.3; Mac OS X, Mavericks, distnoted process Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:52:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1390085568209-310818.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <013FF6AE-1615-454A-AB1E-A289EC1E67F0@till.com> <1389719733663-310127.post@n5.nabble.com> <9A5A8994-89C0-40A0-B930-40634D63A787@jpayne.net> <7F75EF1D-CA22-4F81-A398-94B47946C893@swipnet.se> <5422F2A6-E434-4626-9A7A-512588D0B563@swipnet.se> <1389967916091-310630.post@n5.nabble.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1390085654 15668 80.91.229.3 (18 Jan 2014 22:54:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 22:54:14 +0000 (UTC) To: 15946@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 18 23:54:21 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W4emS-0007g6-S2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 23:54:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44550 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4emS-0001dt-B3 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:54:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4emI-0001dU-Tj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:54:17 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4emB-0004Lt-1D for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:54:10 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:42427) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4emA-0004Lp-Tt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:54:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4emA-0006Sh-Gt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:54:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: canoeberry Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2014 22:54:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15946 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo X-Debbugs-Original-To: Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.139008558924742 (code B ref -1); Sat, 18 Jan 2014 22:54:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2014 22:53:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56446 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4elI-0006Qw-Ia for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:53:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55010) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W4elG-0006Qo-Cg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:53:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4elA-0004A9-Aw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:53:06 -0500 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:38361) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4elA-0004A5-7i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4el5-0001Zs-5x for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:53:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4el0-00047m-25 for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:52:55 -0500 Original-Received: from sam.nabble.com ([216.139.236.26]:41459) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W4ekz-00047P-T8 for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 17:52:49 -0500 Original-Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1W4eky-0000MX-6z for Bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Jan 2014 14:52:48 -0800 In-Reply-To: <1389967916091-310630.post@n5.nabble.com> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83694 Archived-At: I had downloaded a nightly and was so happy to see that the memory leak was gone. However, the nightly has a ton of other problems with a package that is near and dear to my heart at the moment: mumamo. So I have downloaded the source and compiled it and tried to patch it with the suggestion involving a patch early in this bug report, but that has not solved the problem. Then I remembered that I could get stack traces, which I have done: Call stack: [thread 0x7fff71dce310]: | 0x1 | start | main emacs.c:1528 | Frecursive_edit keyboard.c:844 | recursive_edit_1 keyboard.c:1148 | internal_catch eval.c:1060 | command_loop_2 keyboard.c:1168 | internal_condition_case eval.c:1290 | command_loop_1 keyboard.c:1459 | read_key_sequence keyboard.c:9234 | read_char keyboard.c:2059 | wait_reading_process_output process.c:4743 | detect_input_pending_run_timers keyboard.c:6680 | readable_events keyboard.c:3355 | timer_check keyboard.c:4378 | call1 eval.c:2572 | Ffuncall eval.c:2850 | funcall_lambda eval.c:3010 | exec_byte_code bytecode.c:1096 | internal_lisp_condition_case eval.c:1243 | eval_sub eval.c:2149 | exec_byte_code bytecode.c:900 | Ffuncall eval.c:2759 | Fapply eval.c:2255 | Ffuncall eval.c:2850 | funcall_lambda eval.c:3010 | exec_byte_code bytecode.c:900 | Ffuncall eval.c:2775 | Finput_pending_p keyboard.c:6687 | gobble_input keyboard.c:6768 | ns_read_socket nsterm.m:3424 | -[NSApplication run] | -[NSApplication _installMemoryStatusDispatchSources] | dispatch_source_create | _os_object_alloc_realized | class_createInstance | calloc | malloc_zone_calloc Leak: 0x1040efe20 size=160 zone: DefaultMallocZone_0x100630000 OS_dispatch_source ObjC libdispatch.dylib 0x71162c20 0x00007fff 0x00000001 0x00000000 ,.q............ 0x89abcdef 0xffffffff 0x71164480 0x00007fff .........D.q.... 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 ................ 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 ................ 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 ................ 0x00000001 0x00000000 0x00000175 0x00000000 ........u....... 0x8316090c 0x00007fff 0x00804760 0x00000001 ........`G...... 0x040e2120 0x00000001 0x00000002 0x0000004c !..........L... ... The last line of code in emacs that produces this leak is: if (++apploopnr != 1) { emacs_abort (); } [NSApp run]; --apploopnr; well it's the --apploopnr according to leaks! A little weird if you ask me. Anyway - does anybody have any insights into this? ----- Jonathan Payne -- View this message in context: http://emacs.1067599.n5.nabble.com/bug-15946-24-3-Mac-OS-X-Mavericks-distnoted-process-tp303500p310818.html Sent from the Emacs - Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.