From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stephen Gildea Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#32931: time-stamp-format: offer numeric time zones too Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 08:51:19 -0800 Message-ID: <13854.1573318279@quatro> References: <87zhvvwatd.fsf@jidanni.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="48529"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, 32931@debbugs.gnu.org, jidanni@jidanni.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 09 17:52:11 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTy6-000CT8-U9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 17:52:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTy5-0004j3-OL for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:52:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54858) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTxz-0004it-Te for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:52:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTxy-0006TQ-LS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:52:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41385) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTxy-0006TA-IR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:52:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTxy-0006DE-FT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:52:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Stephen Gildea Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:52:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 32931 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 32931-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B32931.157331829023834 (code B ref 32931); Sat, 09 Nov 2019 16:52:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 32931) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Nov 2019 16:51:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50206 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTxO-0006CJ-Uo for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:51:30 -0500 Original-Received: from tigger.sg.gildea.net ([99.65.78.170]:33004 helo=quatro.sg.gildea.net) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1iTTxN-0006C6-QP for 32931@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Nov 2019 11:51:26 -0500 Original-Received: from quatro (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by quatro.sg.gildea.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2E11BFA15; Sat, 9 Nov 2019 08:51:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Message from eliz@gnu.org of 9 Nov 2019 09:15:32 +0200 <83pni1a5bf.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.7.1-RC3; GNU Emacs 25.2.2 Content-ID: <13853.1573318279.1@quatro> X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:171333 Archived-At: > > Given all the above, are you sure we want to document this now? > > I think so, yes. Unless I'm missing something important. Thank you for sharing your perspective, Eli. I am working on a bug fix for the new format. I'll include documentation in that commit. < Stephen