From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: nixie Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8379: The width of linum window is not adjusted afterface-remapping Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 18:31:59 +0900 Message-ID: <1301563919.2220.14.camel@nixie-desktop> References: <1301449429.2448.36.camel@nixie-desktop> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1301564245 20857 80.91.229.12 (31 Mar 2011 09:37:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:37:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 8379@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 31 11:37:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5EJa-0001hJ-Sr for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 11:37:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43421 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5EJZ-0005vy-T9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:37:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42216 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q5EJV-0005vt-0w for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:37:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5EJT-00014f-Mt for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:49994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5EJT-00014a-Jz for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5EIL-0003SU-UF; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:36:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: nixie Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:36:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8379 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8379-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8379.130156412013246 (code B ref 8379); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 09:36:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8379) by debbugs.gnu.org; 31 Mar 2011 09:35:20 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5EHg-0003Rb-Bj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:35:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-yi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q5EHd-0003RP-Qi for 8379@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:35:18 -0400 Original-Received: by yic13 with SMTP id 13so872423yic.3 for <8379@debbugs.gnu.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:35:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references :content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KUP3kcFBVf5wqJKQxq0UO1fzHSosG6UlHbht8JOf2DA=; b=r9j/veOIAlxXJgywzDm5SqEOK6sKpuKDyGExZ7frq7dczS7O0LP5aGq4est0gre5hR 1U1CHPaE9yUvbGT8Z4cL+U3sLbq9Wd0MZbn5iZtkPiJKqwWos1/KktlnfZSuzbSEtudu crAqL/rbqC+pT2Fm/v3GXZWDU91CqEeLW5PDs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=HblEEBagQ4Uj2Gowf6X1j+5h5Sa0pHpCtidGDxGqFinB4/EJ3hDjLnUeAMfQWUocFR yYXjGkkWVOoRkUlAXB9IBPz/4KVRykRdq2R6rBk2I0nqGCQs9XoYZamu903nYPhj6lyp 62FCktXiBI4xlfGkPBrKDARViAnvyjPB6d3c0= Original-Received: by 10.236.185.161 with SMTP id u21mr3491301yhm.99.1301564112449; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:35:12 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from [192.168.2.14] ([222.92.128.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l74sm487306yhn.45.2011.03.31.02.35.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 31 Mar 2011 02:35:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:36:01 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:45520 Archived-At: > forcemerge 1255 8379 > thanks >> I found that the width of linum window is not changed with >> (text-scale-increase) or (text-scale-decrease) function. > This is bug#1255: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1255 Sorry for not kindly reading the threads archives. > Yes, but, if I'm reading correctly the old thread, he didn't say that > there wasn't a bug, only that the bug is not in text scaling, but in > applications (like linum) that can be affected for it and do not plan > accordingly. > > Juanma yes, i think it is not a bug in text scaling. But i don't think fix it in applications (maybe not only the linum) is a good idea. I wonder if there is a pure and smart window adjusting function. -- nixie