From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#66779: 30.0.50; Gnus Article faces are not applied if attachment Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:45:01 +0200 Message-ID: <12952.1097916708$1704912404@news.gmane.org> References: <87y1fkcmlm.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="13734"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: stefankangas@gmail.com To: 66779@debbugs.gnu.org Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 10 19:46:35 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdb0-0003Mz-Os for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 19:46:34 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdaf-0004tZ-Su; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:46:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdaY-0004t9-Nk for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:46:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdaV-00039x-4X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:46:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdaT-0005wH-MY; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:46:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Bidar Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org, bugs@gnus.org Resent-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:46:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 66779 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,gnus Original-Received: via spool by 66779-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B66779.170491231217045 (code B ref 66779); Wed, 10 Jan 2024 18:46:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 66779) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Jan 2024 18:45:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43173 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdZg-0004QK-FJ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from thaodan.de ([185.216.177.71]:51900) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rNdZc-0003z0-RF for 66779@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 13:45:10 -0500 Original-Received: from odin (dsl-trebng12-50dc77-87.dhcp.inet.fi [80.220.119.87]) by thaodan.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 843B4D03B54; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 20:45:03 +0200 (EET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=thaodan.de; s=mail; t=1704912303; bh=+rGPpcIWAaL2ucgMmHAarvLCXn1PYSZZ3+Yn+kcD51g=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=ky6H1Wu3F2NNsOn0KYKPrB3rrRkgt93b5dXYKswKY2xsCPzpzrIjH20GuHLw2bbAh TLT4v/A3xSgg6YRqk+BPyfdO7tHHLQmjvt1z9Fi/dy5jFcR8c8cTPSAn7EmQ8XF4Vi 2lj1evxZrG111joZdc4Fw0LuTzKNSPHV7emNswnbg/ulOewGzAS6an82j2tNzM6gNc MDxw+JKkO4ofmk0An37d22j9G/1hBPhMrtGCjlEHnp9uozxiQi1toQKXX1RlIr3L6N zl1aSzUVEHeHAow1o3mh3xSD8/Tbh0didYJBic/qyA4JRNO09whg2gfvG8CyZNCrYG HzOhgQnLgJVCR2i6s7cNHOJVApym0Yu7vWMr3PAf1bWQdwzn3FbPxqG/LZbUIQeQB8 TY8Htk+AsFu1biwet35fdttEp/r/+CECqKLRlm8j66Uiz+euSJk3MFQah7o5CBlMwg JEiGXxFPaov46iXiQ9KkGqEHZW+uVP2aJbV+HR7bw1RwbZGWF1QrS+zcxn6usEo+Ka wk4LZjzHgW9Vp6M12YomA8ay7Tj2ghAZzbZQMl19e634glmFNfeAhVa6GSH+lJo4uS opwhuUX4wv+HDVU1jwVJbqIn69BLBE6rgf3YlTqBDdFcuA7m6oS1qffvTyQItPgv0q MgEm/p0UXkK8zG4VxluHPZKQ= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Kangas's message of "Wed, 10 Jan 2024 09:59:22 -0800") Autocrypt: addr=bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEZNfpPhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdACBEmr+0xwIIHZfIDlZmm7sa+lHHSb0g9FZrN6qE6ru60JUJq w7ZybiBCaWRhciA8Ympvcm4uYmlkYXJAdGhhb2Rhbi5kZT6IlgQTFgoAPgIbAwULCQgHAgIiAgYV CgkICwIEFgIDAQIeBwIXgBYhBFHxdut1RzAepymoq1wbdKFlHF9oBQJk1/YmAhkBAAoJEFwbdKFl HF9oB9cBAJoIIGQKXm4cpap+Flxc/EGnYl0123lcEyzuduqvlDT0AQC3OlFKm/OiqJ8IMTrzJRZ8 phFssTkSrrFXnM2jm5PYDoiTBBMWCgA7FiEEUfF263VHMB6nKairXBt0oWUcX2gFAmTX6T4CGwMF CwkIBwICIgIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwECHgcCF4AACgkQXBt0oWUcX2hbCQEAtru7kvM8hi8zo6z9ux2h K+B5xViKuo7Z8K3IXuK5ugwA+wUfKzomzdBPhfxDsqLcEziGRxoyx0Q3ld9aermBUccHtBxCasO2 cm4gQmlkYXIgPG1lQHRoYW9kYW4uZGU+iJMEExYKADsCGwMFCwkIBwICIgIGFQoJCAsCBBYCAwEC HgcCF4AWIQRR8XbrdUcwHqcpqKtcG3ShZRxfaAUCZNf2FQAKCRBcG3ShZRxfaCzSAP4hZ7cSp0YN XYpcjHdsySh2MuBhhoPeLGXs+2kSiqBiOwD/TP8AgPEg/R+SI9GI9on7fBJJ0mp2IT8kZ2rhDOjg gA6IkwQTFgoAOxYhBFHxdut1RzAepymoq1wbdKFlH X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:277811 Archived-At: Stefan Kangas writes: > Manuel Giraud writes: > >> Bj=C3=B6rn Bidar writes: >> >>> * Description >>> When an article contains an attachment faces for things >>> such as cites are not applied in the article buffer. >>> An example would be an article containing a signature or >>> an html and text part. >> >> Hi, >> >> I cannot reproduce. I have reply to a mail (citing its content) and add >> a file as attachment. The cited part is correctly rendered with the >> 'gnus-cite-1' face. >> >> Don't you think it could come from HTML rendering (or washing)? > > No further comments within 2 months, so I'm closing this bug. Sorry oversaw the email/forgot to reply. In case you still want my reply: I was explicitly talking about the text part of the email, so nothing regarding rendering. I also don't do any washing. Did you also had a multipart email with text/html and text/plain when you tried to reproduce?