From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Mark A. Hershberger" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45056: 28.0.50; lexical-let doesn't work with returned closures on nativecomp Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2020 16:26:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <119793380.161961.1607214402491.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> References: <87h7p05dax.fsf@everybody.org> <216496280.161579.1607203268073.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> <1009119049.161679.1607205441220.JavaMail.zimbra@nichework.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34865"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: "Mark A. Hershberger" , 45056@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 06 01:27:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klhtV-0008vb-8B for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2020 01:27:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53450 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klhtT-0008P5-N2 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:27:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:45378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klhtH-0008Ov-KO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:27:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36953) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klhtG-0003Ha-G5 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:27:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klhtG-000138-AV for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:27:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: "Mark A. Hershberger" Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2020 00:27:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45056 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45056-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45056.16072144104016 (code B ref 45056); Sun, 06 Dec 2020 00:27:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45056) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Dec 2020 00:26:50 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48499 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klht3-00012h-Li for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:26:49 -0500 Original-Received: from nospam.nichework.com ([206.71.169.33]:43965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1klhsy-00012U-VJ for 45056@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2020 19:26:48 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdmain [127.0.0.1]) by nospam.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C60B006E; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:25:46 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: nospam; dmarc=none header.from=nichework.com Authentication-Results: nospam.nichework.com; dkim=pass reason="2048-bit key; insecure key" header.d=nichework.com header.i=@nichework.com header.b=cFLk1YfQ; dkim-adsp=pass; dkim-atps=neutral X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at nospam.nichework.com Original-Received: from nospam.nichework.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nospam.nichework.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xqdWU6RzkYd9; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:25:45 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com (mail.nichework.com [108.161.151.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by nospam.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A51BEB0055; Sat, 5 Dec 2020 19:25:45 -0500 (EST) Authentication-Results: nospam; dmarc=none header.from=nichework.com Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6C4D4E0114; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 00:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6664E0171; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 00:26:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mail.nichework.com 9D6664E0171 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nichework.com; s=897144A4-59D1-11EA-885D-1509A2A44C35; t=1607214402; bh=msbD0HzfrDDgT0+X7ayyDVgR1W9FibinMXMVIUSutsg=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=cFLk1YfQU5fDhwHCDF5w+nMkIMF9h+7uopqrch8ZnnhaVqyh2HZOUm0KutzDcWiF8 pblVCRnOB27Jz8F0I7+Da0we4XqZ8jxifryhTUZABLrMwxjE7/ApIVchy9Rc0h6kGH 2HNMhPMOjKleGju41oqlzxcDJcmiJZJImnho/fPsODfPlobpCOVI2JDVJ3yqn+wZOf +zGPM3KnEeSfQUGmkOAzhviz4kc5PJ4+vjSwHgLY1kqX1f3MAr62L48ELFcYJddmoZ kR0Daq8sJHyblkszLsoCyrMc3Wg7EIcMPdmeoY+fHbcapPPDNpthX5Rt6BXnr49zhN YpOORlhAAvyCw== Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.nichework.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id M9KzFQ0aZaq1; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 00:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: from mail.nichework.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.nichework.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AA484E0120; Sun, 6 Dec 2020 00:26:42 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: X-Originating-IP: [209.253.11.94] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.8.15_GA_3975 (ZimbraWebClient - FF85 (Linux)/8.8.15_GA_3975) Thread-Topic: bug#45056: 28.0.50; lexical-let doesn't work with returned closures on nativecomp Thread-Index: 1mYjM/AyLM2vwaMRkC25fV7X6kjjMA== X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:195065 Archived-At: On Dec 5, 2020, at 5:06 PM, Andrea Corallo akrl@sdf.org wrote: > could you provide a reproducer I can load and run possibly with -batch? I'm not sure how to do that since the file executed with -batch would be eval'd at runtime and this is using compiled code.